Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Larry Reynolds Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$52kArts & Culture$6kPublic Benefit$6kCrime & Legal$3kReligion$2kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$328Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$103k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
THE CHURCHIL SOCIETY$750
Individual grant recipient$500
METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION$500
PRESERVATION RESOURCE CENTER$500
TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE$500
SPRING FIESTA ASSOCIATION$328
LOUISIANA MUSEUM$300
AURBOR DAY FOUNDATION$300
DAUGHTERS OF ST PAUL$100
LOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME$100
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $18k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $17k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $8k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $5k → 23%TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE: $500 → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$62k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
18

Total granted

$62k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+52%

Still filing today

40%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue -72%
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART
    4× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue -32%
  • MC
    METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • LP
    LOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • NM
    NATIONAL MS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Lafayette General Medical Center Inc

To restore, maintain, and imprive health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC — $48,780 · Human ServicesTRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INCLOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUM — $5,750 · OtherLOUISIANA POLITICAL MUSEUMMETROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC — $3,000 · OtherMETROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INCTHE CHURCHIL SOCIETY — $1,700 · OtherTHE CHURCHIL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient — $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL MS SOCIETY — $1,500 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYSALVATION ARMY — $1,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYUNO FOUNDATION — $1,500 · OtherUNO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $1,410 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOUISIANA MUSEUM — $1,050 · Other+19 more — $4,056 · Other+19 moreNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART — $3,500 · Arts & CultureBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,500 · HealthOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $100 · HealthINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN — $100 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $50 · Education
Human Services$48,780Other$22,966Arts & Culture$3,500Health$1,600Education$150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC — $48,780 over 5y, 18% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRIUMPH OF SPECIAL PEOPLE INC
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF BROOKLYN
  • Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MONUMENTAL TASK COMMITTEE INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Larry Reynolds Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph