Skip to content

· Public charity

Lansing Promise

We provide scholarships and support for Lansing students journeys to postsecondary completion.

$416k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$336k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.9MPhilanthropy$83kHealth$42kPublic Benefit$11kYouth Development$10k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $399,078, the rows itemized in this filing. The $415,632 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,554 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $336k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Michigan State University$335,632
Magic of Literacy$50,000
Lansing School District$13,446
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Olivet College: $66k → 9%Davenport University: $6k → 11%Regents of University of Michigan: $6k → 14%Lansing Comm College: $269k → 16%Olivet College: $66k → 9%Lansing Comm College: $214k → 16%Olivet College: $53k → 9%Lansing Comm College: $214k → 16%Olivet College: $16k → 9%Lansing Comm College: $210k → 16%Olivet College: $16k → 9%Lansing Community College: $164k → 16%Lansing Community College: $146k → 16%Lansing Community College: $116k → 16%Lansing Comm College: $71k → 16%Lansing Comm College: $55k → 16%Magic of Literacy: $50k → 16%Bro Against Drugs: $42k → 16%Lansing School District: $36k → 16%Lansing School District: $22k → 16%Lansing School District: $21k → 16%Lansing School District: $19k → 16%Lansing School District: $13k → 16%Lansing Economic Area Partnership: $6k → 16%The Village of Lansing: $6k → 16%The Village of Lansing: $6k → 16%Michigan State University: $336k → 16%Michigan State Univ: $222k → 16%Michigan State Univ: $209k → 16%Michigan State Univ: $209k → 16%Michigan State University: $185k → 16%Michigan State Univ: $145k → 16%Michigan State University: $76k → 16%Michigan State University: $59k → 16%United Way South Central Michigan: $60k → 16%CapCAN - CAUW: $12k → 16%CapCAN - CAUW: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 7 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$3.4M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+146%

Still filing today

43%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Lansing Comm College
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M
  • MS
    MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2026 · $1.4M
  • OLIVET COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $217k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2025 · $60k · revenue 0%
  • AO
    ALL OF THE ABOVE HIP HOP ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +146%
  • DU
    DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Lansing Destination Development Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
3
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
8
Michigan Virtual University

Maximize learning and teaching by bringing together the best in people and technology.

Education
9
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
10
Lackawanna College

Lackawanna college is an accredited, private, non-profit education institution whose mission is to provide a quality education to all persons who seek to improve their lives and better the communities in which they live. the college…

Education
11
East-West University

East-west university is an independent institution of higher learning located in downtown chicago. its mission is the pursuit of excellence by all through relevant, effective and convenient education and service to humankind with a global,…

Education
12
Urban League of Louisiana

To empower communities and help change liver for african americans and other emerging communities and groups. the urban league seeks to eliminate barriers to opportunity and assist individuals in attaining economic self sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of South Central Michigan; the most unlike its peers is Brotherhood Against Drugs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lansing Comm College: $1,456,928 · OtherLansing Comm CollegeMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,439,825 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYLansing Public Schools Educational: $112,236 · Other+3 more: $39,000 · OtherOLIVET COLLEGE: $216,796 · Education+1 more: $6,189 · EducationBROTHERHOOD AGAINST DRUGS: $91,966 · HealthUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $60,000 · PhilanthropyALL OF THE ABOVE HIP HOP ACADEMY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLANSING ECONOMIC AREA PARTNERSHIP: $5,750 · Community Improvement
Other$3,047,989Education$222,985Health$91,966Philanthropy$60,000Arts & Culture$10,000Community Improvement$5,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLIVET COLLEGE: $216,796 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLansing Public Schools Educational: $112,236 over 5y, 35% of budgetBROTHERHOOD AGAINST DRUGS: $91,966 over 2y, 21% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCapital Area United Way Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALL OF THE ABOVE HIP HOP ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $6,189 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLIVET COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Lansing Public Schools Educational ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERHOOD AGAINST DRUGS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Capital Area United Way Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALL OF THE ABOVE HIP HOP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LANSING ECONOMIC AREA PARTNERSHIP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lansing Promise funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lansing Promise. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lansing Promise’s filings →

    More from the funding graph