How much did LANE ARTS COUNCIL grant in FY2023?

LANE ARTS COUNCIL reported 1 grants totaling $66,173 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is LANE ARTS COUNCIL based?

LANE ARTS COUNCIL is based in OR.

LANE ARTS COUNCIL

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

LANE ARTS COUNCIL

LANE ARTS COUNCIL cultivates belonging, learning, and investment to engage all of lane county in the transformative power of the arts.

$66k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$5k

Largest

01What you fund

0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2023.

Arts & Culture$1.6MEducation$217kAnimals$153kEnvironment$105kCivil Rights$11kOther$475k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2021

concertsculturalperformanceeugenededicatedorchestraevery

2023

dance

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,375

Median grant

States reached

$791k

Total assets

Largest grants

DANCEABILITY INTERNATIONAL$5,375

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oregon Music Education Association

To Enhance Education of Youth in Oregon.

Arts & Culture

Early Music Guild of Oregon

We give concerts, workshops and online music classes.

—

Seattle Opera

To thrill, inspire and educate through the shared experience of opera

Arts & Culture

Portland Youth Philharmonic Association

To prepare young people for success through musical excellence.

Arts & Culture

Opera Theater Oregon

The mission of opera theater oregon is to create, develop, and produce new operatic work, with an emphasis on projects that engage the community on issues of environment and social justice. with an emphasis on contemporary music and…

Arts & Culture

Portland Museum of Art

Museum/Educational

Arts & Culture

Oregon Conservatory of Perfoming Arts

Organization dedicated to the advancement of The Performing Arts

Arts & Culture

Central Oregon Center for the Arts

The mission for the central oregon center for the arts is to champion an inclusive, vibrant center for the arts that brings transformative and diverse cultural performances and experiences to central oregon during all seasons

Arts & Culture

Cascadia Concert Opera

Cascadia Chamber Opera is dedicated to making exceptional and imaginative opera accessible to audiences throughout the Pacific Northwest.

Arts & Culture

Cedar City Music Arts Association

Music & arts performances

Arts & Culture

Partners for the Pac

Provide support for operation of Performing Arts Center located at 588 16th St, Astoria OR 97103

Arts & Culture

Seattle Chamber Music Festival

To foster the appreciation of chamber music in our region by presenting performances featuring world-class musicians in accessible and inviting formats, with an emphasis on developing a broad-based sustainable audience through education…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eugene Ballet Company and the most unlike its peers is University of Oregon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/46

the rest of the field

191/2,102

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/42

Grantees still filing

28/42

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Arts & Culture$1,589,737Other$474,597Education$216,807Animals$152,693Environment$104,987Civil Rights$10,720

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR51× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · James F & Marion L Miller Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · The Haugland Family Foundation · The Woodard Family Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation · The EvansKabush Family Foundation · Reed Family Foundation Inc · Juan Young Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LANE ARTS COUNCIL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GRUPO LATINO DE ACCION DIRECTA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 300832937 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GRUPO LATINO DE ACCION DIRECTA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 78% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Lane Arts Council?

Find your warmest path to Lane Arts Council through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LANE ARTS COUNCIL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lane Arts Council?

More from the funding graph

LANE ARTS COUNCIL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Lane Arts Council?

More from the funding graph