Skip to content

· Public charity

Lancaster County Conservancy

The mission of the LANCASTER COUNTY CONSERVANCY is "providing wild and forested lands and clean waterways for our community forever".

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Lancaster County Conservancy’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Lancaster County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’19
2
’20
1
’21
1
’22
1
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$112kPhilanthropy$50kRecreation & Sports$40kArts & Culture$34kCommunity Improvement$20kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $32,625, the rows itemized in this filing. The $47,875 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$92M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
KEYSTONE TRAILS ASSOCIATION$5,125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KEYSTONE TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER ASSOCIATION: $17k → 9%EDEN TOWNSHIP: $10k → 9%LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER ASSOCIATION: $9k → 9%CONOY TOWNSHIP: $10k → 9%WRIGHTSVILLE BOROUGH: $8k → 9%HALDEMAN MANSION PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $6k → 9%DELTA BOROUGH: $5k → 9%COLUMBIA BUROUGH: $6k → 9%COLUMBIA BUROUGHLANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%MANOR TOWNSHIP: $25k → 9%LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%LANCASTER COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $16k → 9%LANCASTER COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $15k → 9%LANCASTER COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $5k → 9%MARIETTA RESTORATION ASSOCIATES: $11k → 9%MARIETTA RESTORATION ASSOCIATES: $7k → 9%CONESTOGA TOWNSHIP: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of Lancaster County Conservancy’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 76%.

Lancaster County Conservancylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64k · 3 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +131% since the first grant, against +65% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$64k
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+131%
+65%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    STEWARDS OF THE LOWER SUSQUEHANNA INC DBA LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER ASS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $26k · revenue +131%
  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k
  • MR
    MARIETTA RESTORATION ASSOCIATESINC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $18k · revenue +26% · 36% of their budget

Funded once

  • CB
    COLUMBIA BUROUGHLANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • DC
    DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITEDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $21k · revenue +65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Little Conestoga Creek Foundation
—
2
Essex County Conservation Alliance

Preservation of essex county virginia's rural characteristics, its scenic lands, natural resources, and historic structures.

Environment
3
Economic Development Company of Lancaster County

Enhance the economic well-being of lancaster county by bringing together business resources, capital and government for selective, measurable and sustainable growth.

—
4
Lancaster County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Support member businesses through education and promotion, and support the quality of life in lancaster county through promoting compatible economic development.

Community Improvement
5
Erie Marsh Conservation Foundation
Environment
6
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
7
Cumberland Valley Preservation Soci Ety At Silver S

Preservation

Environment
8
Lower Howards Creek Nature and Heritage Preserve Inc

The organization was formed to manage a 441 acre nature preserve. management includes controlling invasive species of plants, having archaeological surveys conducted and restoring historical sites.

Environment
9
Conservation Officers of Pennsylvania Association

Increase understanding, awareness and support for role of pennsylvania's conservation officers in the management of our natural resources through public outreach porgrams and by promoting professional and fraternalism within organization.

Environment
10
Red River Economic Development

Economic Development and Tourism Promotion in Eastern Kentucky

Community Improvement
11
Friends of Lackawanna

Friends of lackawanna is a pennsylvania non-profit corporation dedicated to supporting the health and welfare of the residents of northeastern pennsylvania and educating individuals regarding the health and safety of the enviroment.

Environment
12
Lancaster County Conservancy

The mission of the lancaster county conservancy is "providing wild and forested lands and clean waterways for our community forever". the charitable purposes of the lancaster county conservancy include preservation of natural lands,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Keystone Trails Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBIA BUROUGHLANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA BUROUGHLANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLANCASTER COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES: $20,000 · OtherLANCASTER COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIESMARIETTA RESTORATION ASSOCIATESINC: $18,368 · OtherMARIETTA RESTORATION ASSOCIATESINCLANCASTER COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $16,429 · OtherLANCASTER COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $9,969 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherHaldeman Mansion Preservation Soc: $5,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherLANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyLANCASTER COUNTY COMM…STEWARDS OF THE LOWER SUSQUEHANNA INC DBA LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER ASS: $25,725 · EnvironmentSTEWARDS OF THE LOW…DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED: $20,970 · EnvironmentDONEGAL CHAPTER TRO…KEYSTONE TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $5,125 · Recreation & Sports
Other$163,466Philanthropy$50,000Environment$46,695Recreation & Sports$5,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEWARDS OF THE LOWER SUSQUEHANNA INC DBA LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER ASS: $25,725 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetMARIETTA RESTORATION ASSOCIATESINC: $18,368 over 2y, 36% of budgetHaldeman Mansion Preservation Soc: $5,700 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetKEYSTONE TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $5,125 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEWARDS OF THE LOWER SUSQUEHANNA INC DBA LOWER SUSQUEHANNA RIVERKEEPER ASS ↗
  • Who funds DONEGAL CHAPTER TROUT UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds MARIETTA RESTORATION ASSOCIATESINC ↗
  • Who funds Haldeman Mansion Preservation Soc ↗
  • Who funds KEYSTONE TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lancaster County Conservancy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lancaster County Conservancy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lancaster County Conservancy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph