· Public charity
Lambda Chi Alpha Educational Foundation
To invest in the ever-growing educational pursuits of Lambda Chi Alpha, enabling its transformation into the premier men's service learning and leadership development organization.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of Lambda Chi Alpha Educational Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $2,325,752 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,192,125 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $866,373 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lamba Chi Alpha Fraternity | $2,325,752 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLambda Chi Alpha Fraternity Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $5.8M · revenue +54%
- LCLAMBDA CHI ALPHA GAMMA RHO ZETA2× · 2017–2019 · $151k · revenue +30%
- LCLambda Chi Alpha Fraternity Inc Zeta Delta Zeta2× · 2019–2020 · $114k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- LCLAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY CHI ZETAone grant, 2017 · $1.1M · revenue -94%
- ECEPSILON CHI ZETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $191k · revenue +48% · 65% of their budget
- BKBETA KAPPA HOUSE CORPORATION INCone grant, 2018 · $34k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide housing to undergrad chapter and fellowship to alumni.
Chapter housing leased to members to provide an environment for study, sleep, hygiene, meals and fellowship, suitable for the development of men attending the institute for education.
Fraternal organization housing
Housing for college fraternity
To provide guidance and shelter to members
To own and maintain a housing facility for chi psi fraternity members at the university of georgia.
Hold real property used by undergraduate chapter of nationally chartered social fraternity.
Fraternity organization providing meeting space chapter activities and lodging
Alpha Gamma Delta is an international womens fraternity that promotes academic excellence philanthropic giving ongoing leadership and personal development and above all a spirit of loving sisterhood.
Provide housing and meeting place for members
Furnish housing to approximately 42 members of the zeta lambda chapter of alpha delta pi sorority and furnish a meeting place for social activities
Provide Chapter House for Students
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity Inc Zeta Delta Zeta and the most unlike its peers is Psz House Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity Inc ↗
- Who funds ALPHA ETA BUILDING FUND CORP ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY CHI ZETA ↗
- Who funds The Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity Management Corporation ↗
- Who funds EPSILON CHI ZETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA CHI ALPHA GAMMA RHO ZETA ↗
- Who funds Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity Inc Zeta Delta Zeta ↗
- Who funds BETA KAPPA HOUSE CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds PSZ HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY EPSILON CHI ZETA ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lambda Chi Alpha Educational Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.