Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lamarche Creek Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$324kHuman Services$64kPhilanthropy$7kArts & Culture$7kEnvironment$2k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION UMD SALES CENTER$25,000
BEST CHRISTMAS EVER$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$12,000
FOND DU LAC TRIBAL & COMM COLLEGE FOUNDATION$6,000
MESABI RANGE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$6,000
CLOQUET COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$2,500
ESKO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,500
THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE$1,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES$1,000
FAMILY PATHWAYS$500
CARLTON CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION$250
PBS CH8 DULUTH-SUPERIOR ED TV$250
TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%FAMILY PATHWAYS: $500 → 5%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$402k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$402k
$0

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $143k · revenue +137%
  • MR
    MESABI RANGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +3%
  • FD
    FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +33%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Lake Superior College Foundation Inc

    Provide financial support to promote the educational, cultural, scientific, and charitable activities of lake superior college duluth, mn.

    —
    2
    Minnesota State College Southeast Foundation

    Minnesota state college southeast foundation assists the college in achieving excellence in technical education for employment by developing financial and community resources for students, employers, and communities within our service area.

    Education
    3
    Minnesouri Scholarship Foundation
    Education
    4
    Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

    Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

    Philanthropy
    5
    University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

    To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

    Education
    6
    Minnesota Business Partnership

    The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

    —
    7
    North Dakota State University Foundation

    Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

    Education
    8
    North Dakota Tribal College System

    Advancing tribal colleges through collaboration and shared goals. ndtcs leverages the higher education experience by sharing ideas and broadening networks and alliances, toward improving students' outcomes.

    Education
    9
    Minnesota State Elks Association Charitable Trust
    Community Improvement
    10
    Minnesota Land Surveyors' Foundation

    Improve the quality of land surveyors throughout education by providing scholarships to those attending land surveying courses

    —
    11
    Minnesota Private College Fund

    The minnesota private college fund serves the shared needs of its members by seeking philanthropic support from corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of its member colleges and universities and the students they educate.

    Education
    12
    Minneapolis Community & Technical College Foundation

    The minneapolis community & technical college foundation helps solve issues of affordability and access to higher education through funds and provides part or all of the funding to the college to develop technical college foundation…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mesabi Range Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    10/10
    Grantees still filing
    10/10
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $143,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONFOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $51,500 · EducationFOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONESKO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 · EducationESKO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCMESABI RANGE FOUNDATION: $51,500 · OtherMESABI RANGE FOUNDATIONBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC: $50,000 · OtherBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INCUNIVERSITY OF MN - DULUTH FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MN - DULUTH FOUNDATIONCLOQUET COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCLOQUET COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION+3 more: $6,000 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $9,000 · Human ServicesFamily Pathways: $4,500 · Human ServicesTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $7,000 · PhilanthropyTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $2,250 · Arts & Culture
    Education$217,000Other$162,500Human Services$13,500Philanthropy$7,000Arts & Culture$2,250

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $143,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMESABI RANGE FOUNDATION: $51,500 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetFOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $51,500 over 9y, 11% of budgetBEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC: $50,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetESKO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $7,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Pathways: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCARLTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 9y, 3.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds MESABI RANGE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds FOND DU LAC TRIBAL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds BEST CHRISTMAS EVER INC ↗
    • Who funds ESKO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
    • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE ↗
    • Who funds Family Pathways ↗
    • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
    • Who funds CARLTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Lamarche Creek Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lamarche Creek Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Lamarche Creek’s filings →

      More from the funding graph