Skip to content

· Public charity

Lake Region Healthcare Corporation

We partner to enrich life through health.

$207k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$60k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Lake Region Healthcare Corporation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Lake Region Healthcare Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Lake Region Healthcare Corporation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $96k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’20
3
’21
3
’22
5
’23
3
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$101kRecreation & Sports$74kCommunity Improvement$71kEducation$54kArts & Culture$25k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $96,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $207,165 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $111,165 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$157M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF FERGUS FALLS$60,000
GREATER FERGUS FALLS CORPORATION$15,000
FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,300
FERGUS FALLS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,600
FERGUS FALLS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$5,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CITY OF FERGUS FALLS: $60k → 9%ASHBY LEGACY FUND: $20k → 11%LAKE REGION HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $57k → 9%CITY OF FERGUS FALLS: $41k → 9%WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $20k → 9%WEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE: $20k → 9%FERGUS FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20k → 9%GREATER FERGUS FALLS CORPORATION: $15k → 9%GREATER FERGUS FALLS CORPORATION: $15k → 9%GREATER FERGUS FALLS CORPORATION: $15k → 9%GREATER FERGUS FALLS CORPORATION: $15k → 9%FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7k → 9%FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%FERGUS FALLS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 9%FERGUS FALLS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 9%FERGUS FALLS AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 9%FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 6 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$316k
$20k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATI
    6× · 2020–2025 · $39k · revenue +133%
  • FF
    FERGUS FALLS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2023 · $34k · revenue +18%
  • CO
    CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF FERGUS FALLS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • FF
    FERGUS FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF FERGUS FALLS: $100,550 · OtherCITY OF FERGUS FALLSOTTER COVE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $65,000 · OtherOTTER COVE CHILDRENS MUSEUMLAKE REGION HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $56,700 · OtherLAKE REGION HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONFERGUS FALLS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $34,100 · OtherFERGUS FALLS HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONFERGUS FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherFERGUS FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARYASHBY LEGACY FUND: $20,000 · OtherASHBY LEGACY FUNDCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF FERGUS FALLS INC: $16,500 · OtherGREATER FERGUS FALLS CORP: $60,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER FERGUS F…FERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATI: $39,400 · EducationFERGUS FAL…
Other$312,850Community Improvement$60,000Education$39,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOTTER COVE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $65,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetGREATER FERGUS FALLS CORP: $60,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetLAKE REGION HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $56,700 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFERGUS FALLS 544 EDUCATION FOUNDATI: $39,400 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetFERGUS FALLS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $34,100 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF FERGUS FALLS INC: $16,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Otter Tail Power Company FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otter Tail Power Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake Region Healthcare Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake Region Healthcare Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lake Region Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph