Skip to content

· Community foundation

Lake Mills Area Community Foundation Inc

Provides grants to organizations within the greater Lake Mills, Wisconsin community for the improvement of the residents of the community to enhance the quality of life.

$223k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$571kRecreation & Sports$75kCrime & Legal$63kCommunity Improvement$30kArts & Culture$25kHuman Services$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kHousing & Shelter$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $183,945, the rows itemized in this filing. The $222,817 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $38,872 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $138k
$7,533
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW MADISON$45,842
LALE MILLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$27,000
UW PLATTEVILLE$21,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LACROSSE$19,250
LAKE MILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$12,500
LAKE MILLS FOOD PANTRY$12,000
MADISON COLLEGE$7,533
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$6,625
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$6,250
MSOE$5,945
LAKE MILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER$5,000
COMMUNITY ACTION COALITION FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN$5,000
CLUB 55$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Trinity Pines Retirement Center: $9k → 8%HAUS OF PEACE: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
IN
UT
CO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$689k · 13 repeat orgs$386k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +163% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
29

Total granted

$689k
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+163%
+14%

Still filing today

8%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON
    6× · 2017–2022 · $176k
  • UM
    UW MADISON
    3× · 2023–2025 · $137k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    6× · 2017–2025 · $69k

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF LAKE MILLS
    one grant, 2017 · $53k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • LM
    Lake Mills Police Departmnt
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake County Economic Development Corporation
—
2
Lake Wales Main Street
Community Improvement
3
Lake Street Council

Lake Street Council engages, serves, and advocates for the Lake Street business community in Minneapolis to ensure the vitality and prosperity of the commercial corridor. The Lake Street Council fosters economic vitality and amplifies Lake…

Community Improvement
4
Lake County Chamber of Commerce

To create and enhance a business climate in which the Chamber members will prosper

—
5
Lakeshore Retrouvaille-Wisconsin

Religious Programming

Human Services
6
Maplewood Residence Inc
—
7
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
8
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
9
North Lake Wellness Center
—
10
Lake Minnetonka Garden Club

To stimulate the knowledge and love of gardening, horticulture, the art of flower arranging, garden history and design and photography; to restore, improve, and protect the quality of the environment through action in the field of…

Environment
11
Leech Lake Area Chamber of Commerce

Attract and inform visitors to and about the leech lake area.

—
12
Lava Lake Institute for Science and Conservation Inc
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rock Lake Activity Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Haus of Peace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON: $176,325 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISONUW MADISON: $137,242 · OtherUW MADISONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $68,975 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINLake Mills Police Department: $63,000 · OtherLake Mills Police DepartmentUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $55,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTACITY OF LAKE MILLS: $52,933 · OtherCITY OF LAKE MILLSIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherLAKE MILLS AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $34,401 · Other+33 more: $357,905 · Other+33 moreLake Mills Main Street Program Inc: $15,000 · Community ImprovementLake Mills Area Chamber of Commerce: $15,000 · Community ImprovementLake Mills Rotary Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGE: $7,500 · EducationEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $7,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,500 · EducationTrinity Pines Retirement Center Inc: $8,542 · Human ServicesHaus of Peace: $8,000 · Human ServicesLake Mills Food Pantry Inc: $12,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$985,781Community Improvement$30,000Education$30,000Human Services$16,542Food & Nutrition$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $22,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetLake Mills Main Street Program Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetLake Mills Area Chamber of Commerce: $15,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetLake Mills Food Pantry Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetLake Mills Rotary Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTrinity Pines Retirement Center Inc: $8,542 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHaus of Peace: $8,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetST OLAF COLLEGE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCK LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Lake Mills Main Street Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lake Mills Area Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds Lake Mills Food Pantry Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lake Mills Rotary Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Trinity Pines Retirement Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Haus of Peace ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Watertown Community Health Foundation IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Watertown Community Health Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake Mills Area Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake Mills Area Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lake Mills Area Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lake Mills Area Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lake Mills Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph