· Public charity
Lake County Wine Alliance
To provide financial support to charitable organizations that foster the arts, healthcare, senior services, and that otherwise engage in charitable activities in lake county, california.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $130,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $210,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $80,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $76k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KELSEYVILLE HIGH SCHOOL | $17,250 |
| UPPER LAKE HIGH SCHOOL | $14,750 |
| MIDDLETOWN HIGH SCHOOL | $14,750 |
| LOWERLAKE HIGH SCHOOL | $14,750 |
| CLEARLAKE HIGH SCHOOL | $14,500 |
| JACKS LAVENDER FARM | $8,500 |
| 4-H LAKE COUNTY | $7,500 |
| OPERATION TANGO MIKE | $7,500 |
| LAKE FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $6,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,500 |
| WORLD WIDE HEALING HANDS | $6,000 |
| MIDDLETOWN MOUNTAIN BIKE TEAM | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Lake Family Resource Center4× · 2021–2024 · $46k · revenue +28%- OTOPERATION TANGO MIKE4× · 2021–2024 · $38k · revenue +11%
- MMOTHER-WISE2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $13k
- LCLAKE COUNTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITYone grant, 2022 · $13k
- MLMENDOCINO LAKE 4-H CAMPone grant, 2021 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To Provide Services, Energy, Assistance, and Meals on Wheels to local Seniors and other low income individuals in need.
Homeless shelter
To provide transportation services to the senior population within the skaneateles school district.
Promotion of social welfare
Food pantry and clothing closet
Provide low cost, fresh & frozen foodfor
Providing care and services for senior citizens.
Provide Senior Citizens daily activity programs and nutrition. A thrift shop is operated to partially support the activities.
Daily activity center for the aging.
Provide transportation to medical appointments for senior or disabled citizens and cancer patients.
Home delivered meals to shut-ins
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakeport Senior Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Konocti Christian Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lake Family Resource Center ↗
- Who funds OPERATION TANGO MIKE ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WORLDWIDE HEALING HANDS ↗
- Who funds LAKEPORT SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTY CHANNEL CATS ↗
- Who funds MOTHER-WISE ↗
- Who funds KONOCTI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds GIVE BACK TRACK INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MIDDLETOWN SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lake County Wine Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lake County Wine Alliance?
Find your warmest path to Lake County Wine Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.