Skip to content
Lake County Tribal Health Consortium Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Lake County Tribal Health Consortium Inc

To provide complete medical and dental care to Native Americans in the area of Lake County, California.

$649k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$192kReligion$75kFood & Nutrition$65kCommunity Improvement$55kHealth$52kCrime & Legal$26kEducation$26kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $515,450, the rows itemized in this filing. The $649,205 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $133,755 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $395k
$15,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$103M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians$90,000
Scotts Valley Bank of Pomo Indians$65,000
Robinson Rancheria Pomo Indians$60,000
Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake$60,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Lake County Wine Alliance$35,000
Latinos United of Lake County$15,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Lakeport Main Street Alliance$10,000
Shop with a Cop Lake County$10,000
California Rural Indian Health Board Inc$10,000
Larca Emergency Relief Fund$10,000
Kelseyville Business Association$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Hospices Services of Lake County: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$263k · 8 repeat orgs$420k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$263k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-47%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $357k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Community ImprovementMembership BenefitArts & CultureHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $70k
  • LC
    LAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $42k · revenue -14%
  • CALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue -12%

Funded once

  • LC
    Lake County Fair Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • 11
    1TEAM 1DREAM
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -99%
  • HS
    HOSPICE SERVICES OF LAKE COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake County Economic Development Corporation
—
2
Lake County Historical Society

Maintain local Pioneer Museum Provide history of pioneer settlers to present day individuals

—
3
Lake County Senior Citizens Association

To Provide Services, Energy, Assistance, and Meals on Wheels to local Seniors and other low income individuals in need.

Human Services
4
Lake Wales Main Street
Community Improvement
5
Lake County Rural Arts Initiative Inc

Lake County Rural Arts Inintiative's mission is to be a catalyst for arts and culture as a driving force in Lake County's economic development and cultural enrichment/education (important to everyone, especially our children). LCRAI will…

Community Improvement
6
Lake County Association of Realtors

Organized to unite those engaged in the recognized branches of the real estate profession, including but not limited to buying, selling, exchanging, renting or leasing, managing, appraising, financing, building, and developing or…

Community Improvement
7
Lgbtq Lake County

To provide support and Visibility to the LGBTQ+ community.

Civil Rights
8
Lake County Animal Services Dba Orphan Dog Rescue

We provide emergency medical services, spays ands neuters for animals in need.

—
9
Greater Lakeport Chamber of Commerce

To elevate the economic vitality and prosperity of lake county.

—
10
Lakeland Leadership League
—
11
Lake District Hospital Auxiliary
Public Benefit
12
Lake County Arts Council

Promotes Arts in Lake County through the operation of an Art Gallery and a Community Theatre.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake County Deputy Sheriffs Association; the most unlike its peers is Kelseyville Business Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
1/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS: $90,000 · OtherBIG VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANSHABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE: $70,000 · OtherHABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKEScotts Valley Bank of Pomo Indians: $65,000 · OtherScotts Valley Bank of Pomo IndiansIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRobinson Rancheria Pomo Indians: $60,000 · OtherRobinson Rancheria Pomo IndiansIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more: $59,975 · Other+7 moreLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE: $42,050 · Arts & CultureLAKEPORT MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Community ImprovementKELSEYVILLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC: $35,000 · HealthLATINOS UNITED OF LAKE COUNTY: $25,500 · EducationLake County Fair Foundation: $24,647 · Recreation & SportsShop with a Cop Lake County: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$494,975Arts & Culture$42,050Community Improvement$40,000Health$35,000Education$25,500Recreation & Sports$24,647Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE: $42,050 over 2y, 20% of budgetCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLATINOS UNITED OF LAKE COUNTY: $25,500 over 2y, 90% of budgetLAKEPORT MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetShop with a Cop Lake County: $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetKELSEYVILLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budget1TEAM 1DREAM: $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetHOSPICE SERVICES OF LAKE COUNTY: $9,775 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLake County Deputy Sheriffs Association: $5,950 over 1y, 7.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake County Tribal Health Consortium Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake County Tribal Health Consortium Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lake County Tribal Health Consortium’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home