Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Lake County Tribal Health Consortium Inc

To provide complete medical and dental care to Native Americans in the area of Lake County, California.

$649k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Arts & Culture$192kReligion$75kFood & Nutrition$65kCommunity Improvement$55kHealth$52kCrime & Legal$26kEducation$26kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $515,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $649,205 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $133,755 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $395k
$15,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$103M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians$90,000
Scotts Valley Bank of Pomo Indians$65,000
Robinson Rancheria Pomo Indians$60,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake$60,000
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Lake County Wine Alliance$35,000
Latinos United of Lake County$15,500
Larca Emergency Relief Fund$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Lakeport Main Street Alliance$10,000
Shop with a Cop Lake County$10,000
California Rural Indian Health Board Inc$10,000
Kelseyville Business Association$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Hospices Services of Lake County: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$263k · 8 repeat orgs$420k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -47% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$263k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-47%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $357k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Community ImprovementMembership BenefitArts & CultureHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $70k
  • LC
    LAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $42k · revenue 0%
  • CALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue -12%

Funded once

  • LC
    Lake County Fair Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • 11
    1TEAM 1DREAM
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -99%
  • HS
    HOSPICE SERVICES OF LAKE COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake County Economic Development Corporation
2
Lake County Historical Society

Maintain local Pioneer Museum Provide history of pioneer settlers to present day individuals

3
Lake County Senior Citizens Association

To Provide Services, Energy, Assistance, and Meals on Wheels to local Seniors and other low income individuals in need.

Human Services
4
Lake Wales Main Street
Community Improvement
5
Lake County Rural Arts Initiative Inc

Lake County Rural Arts Inintiative's mission is to be a catalyst for arts and culture as a driving force in Lake County's economic development and cultural enrichment/education (important to everyone, especially our children). LCRAI will…

Community Improvement
6
Lake County Association of Realtors

Organized to unite those engaged in the recognized branches of the real estate profession, including but not limited to buying, selling, exchanging, renting or leasing, managing, appraising, financing, building, and developing or…

Community Improvement
7
Lgbtq Lake County

To provide support and Visibility to the LGBTQ+ community.

Civil Rights
8
Lake County Animal Services Dba Orphan Dog Rescue

We provide emergency medical services, spays ands neuters for animals in need.

9
Greater Lakeport Chamber of Commerce

To elevate the economic vitality and prosperity of lake county.

10
Lakeland Leadership League
11
Lake District Hospital Auxiliary
Public Benefit
12
Lake County Arts Council

Promotes Arts in Lake County through the operation of an Art Gallery and a Community Theatre.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake County Deputy Sheriffs Association and the most unlike its peers is Kelseyville Business Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
1/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIG VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS — $90,000 · OtherBIG VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANSHABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE — $70,000 · OtherHABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKEScotts Valley Bank of Pomo Indians — $65,000 · OtherScotts Valley Bank of Pomo IndiansIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRobinson Rancheria Pomo Indians — $60,000 · OtherRobinson Rancheria Pomo IndiansIndividual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more — $59,975 · Other+7 moreLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE — $42,050 · Arts & CultureLAKEPORT MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Community ImprovementKELSEYVILLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC — $35,000 · HealthLATINOS UNITED OF LAKE COUNTY — $25,500 · EducationLake County Fair Foundation — $24,647 · Recreation & SportsShop with a Cop Lake County — $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$494,975Arts & Culture$42,050Community Improvement$40,000Health$35,000Education$25,500Recreation & Sports$24,647Crime & Legal$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAKE COUNTY WINE ALLIANCE — $42,050 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA RURAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLATINOS UNITED OF LAKE COUNTY — $25,500 over 2y, 90% of budgetLAKEPORT MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetShop with a Cop Lake County — $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetKELSEYVILLE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budget1TEAM 1DREAM — $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetHOSPICE SERVICES OF LAKE COUNTY — $9,775 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLake County Deputy Sheriffs Association — $5,950 over 1y, 7.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lake County Tribal Health Consortium Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph