Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1

Labor union

$99k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$36k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$6,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$8.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$36k80%
FY20232$25k0%
FY20221$10k0%
FY20211$10k0%
FY20201$10k0%
FY20192$20kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$85kArts & Culture$7kEmployment$7kCommunity Improvement$6kEducation$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Laborers' Int'L Union of North America District Council of ChicagoIL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Laborers' Int'L Union of North America District Council of Chicago

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 with peer funders

About Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1

How much does Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 give?
Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 reported 5 itemized grants totaling $35,950, out of $98,891 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (77%), Arts & Culture (6%), Employment (6%).
Who are Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Terence J O'Sullivan Liuna Charitable Foundation ($50k), Laborers' District Council Charitable Foundation ($35k), A Philip Randolph Pullman Porter Museum ($7k).
Does Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Laborers' Int'L Union of North America District Council of Chicago.
Where is Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 based?
Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1 is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $95k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Laborers' International Union of North America Union Local # 1’s filings →

More from the funding graph