Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Laborers International Union of North America Local 89

The local's primary function includes representing members in matters related to employee-employer relations, including, but not limited to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment, and, to protect and preserve the union as an institution in the performance of its legal and contractual obligations.

$467k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 94% of LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 89’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $435,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $467,425 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $31,925 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
$32,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN DIEGO COALITION ISSUES PAC$150,000
SAN DIEGANS FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE$100,000
SAN DIEGO ALLIANCE FOR TRAFFIC RELI$100,000
MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND$32,000
PROFESSIONAL SPORTS PUBLICATIONS$26,500
SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES$20,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%2-TERM FOR MAYOR & COUNCIL YES ON: $25k → 6%SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES: $27k → 11%LIUNA PSW EDUCATION: $7k → 12%SAN DIEGANS FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $100k → 14%SAN DIEGO ALLIANCE FOR TRAFFIC RELI: $100k → 14%PROFESSIONAL SPORTS: $12k → 6%PROFESSIONAL SPORTS PUBLICATIONS: $27k → 17%A BETTER SAN DIEGO ISSUES COMMITTEE: $25k → 11%LIUNA PSW EDUCATION & EVENT FUND: $6k → 12%SAN DIEGO ALLIANCE FOR TRAFFIC RELI: $50k → 14%PROFESSIONAL SPORTS PUBLICATIONS: $19k → 17%SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES: $20k → 11%YES TO SAFEGUARD: $50k → 12%MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND: $32k → 14%SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES: $20k → 11%PARENTS & TEACHERS FOR NEIGHBOOR: $100k → 12%MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND: $20k → 14%SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES: $20k → 11%SAFETY & LEARNING FOR OUR SCHOOLS: $50k → 12%MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND: $20k → 14%SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES: $20k → 11%MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND: $20k → 14%SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES: $20k → 11%MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND: $20k → 14%SAN DIEGO ALLIANCE FOR TRAFFIC RELI: $100k → 11%MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $15k → 14%IATSE LOCAL 122: $10k → 11%MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND: $10k → 14%SAN DIEGO COALITION ISSUES PAC: $150k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$564k · 5 repeat orgs$550k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +105% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$564k
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
0%

Still filing today

20%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $257k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO ALLIANCE FOR TRAFFIC RELI
    3× · 2021–2024 · $250k
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $127k
  • MQ
    MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND
    6× · 2019–2024 · $122k

Funded once

  • PT
    PARENTS & TEACHERS FOR NEIGHBOOR
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • SL
    Safety & Learning for Our Schools
    one grant, 2018 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN DIEGO ALLIANCE FOR TRAFFIC RELI — $250,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO ALLIANCE FOR TRAFFIC RELISAN DIEGO COALITION ISSUES PAC — $150,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO COALITION ISSUES PACSAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIES — $126,500 · OtherSAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNTIESMIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FND — $122,000 · OtherMIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FNDSAN DIEGANS FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $100,000 · OtherSAN DIEGANS FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGEPARENTS & TEACHERS FOR NEIGHBOOR — $100,000 · OtherPARENTS & TEACHERS FOR NEIGHBOORIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherSafety & Learning for Our Schools — $50,000 · OtherPROFESSIONAL SPORTS PUBLICATIONS — $45,500 · Other+4 more — $54,000 · OtherA BETTER SAN DIEGO ISSUES COMMITTEE — $25,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $14,750 · EducationLIUNA PACIFIC SOUTHWEST EDUCATION AND EVENTS FUND — $6,000 · EducationCesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc — $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,048,000Civil Rights$25,000Education$20,750Youth Development$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSafety & Learning for Our Schools — $50,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetA BETTER SAN DIEGO ISSUES COMMITTEE — $25,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $14,750 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLIUNA PACIFIC SOUTHWEST EDUCATION AND EVENTS FUND — $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Safety & Learning for Our Schools
  • Who funds A BETTER SAN DIEGO ISSUES COMMITTEE
  • Who funds Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND
  • Who funds LIUNA PACIFIC SOUTHWEST EDUCATION AND EVENTS FUND

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Laborers International Union of North America Local 89 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laborers International Union of North America Local 89?

    Find your warmest path to Laborers International Union of North America Local 89 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph