· Public charity
Laborers' Int'L Union Local 563
Local 563 represents approximately 7,500 construction workers employed in minneapolis, mn, st paul, mn and surrounding areas.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $47,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $159,384 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $112,384 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CTUL | $20,000 |
| SAINT PAUL SERVES FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LABORERS' LOCAL 363 | $10,000 |
| UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CDCENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS EN LUCHA8× · 2018–2025 · $148k · revenue +103%
- SPSAINT PAUL SERVES FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +219%
- USUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- ARALL RECEIVING 5000one grant, 2017 · $20k
- MNMINNESOTA NURSES ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +23%
- LLLABORERS LOCAL 630one grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Membership organization representing approximately 300 union members for the purpose of collective bargaining.
Operation of local union.
Labor union
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
Local 563 represents approximately 7,500 construction workers employed in minneapolis, mn, st paul, mn and surrounding areas. its purpose is to organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and…
The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.
Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…
Representing members in matters of collective bargaining.
Provide benefits of union membership
To promote unity of action in dealing with employers and to coordinate and consolidate the activities of its various affiliated local unions so they can work in a harmonious and united way.
To promote and improve the working conditions, wage levels, and fringe benefits of the local's members.
Collective bargaining and representation
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota State Building & Construction Trades Council and the most unlike its peers is Great Plains Life Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS EN LUCHA ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds TERENCE J O'SULLIVAN LIUNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT PAUL SERVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds City Employees Local 363 ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GREAT PLAINS LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Working Partnerships Inc ↗
- Who funds LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA - DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MN AND ND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Great Lakes Region Organizing Committee · Laborers International Union of North America - District Council of Mn and Nd
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Laborers' Int'L Union Local 563 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.