Skip to content

· Private foundation

La Michoacana Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$255k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$701kReligion$175kHuman Services$100kHealth$92kRecreation & Sports$88kCrime & Legal$6kInternational$3kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$604k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$55,000
HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW & RODEO$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$23,193
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$21,578
Individual grant recipient$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$11,000
THE REGIS SCHOOL$10,000
SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$8,000
LONE STAR COLLEGE$6,596
THE COLLEGE OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSI$5,500
HOUSTON POLICE FUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON DOWNTOWN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$4,500
STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HOUSTON POLICE FUNDATION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$961k · 28 repeat orgs$457k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
21

Total granted

$961k
$411k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+19%

Still filing today

18%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCrime & LegalHealthRecreation & SportsInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $113k · revenue +526%
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $11k · revenue +24%
  • HC
    HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • HM
    HOUSTON METHODIST
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • TT
    THE TEJANO CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CATHOLIC SHCO
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
4
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
10
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
11
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
12
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of St Thomas; the most unlike its peers is Novum Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $303,933 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $117,653 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYHOUSTON METHODIST: $100,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODISTTHE TEJANO CENTER: $100,000 · OtherTHE TEJANO CENTERUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $78,104 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CATHOLIC SHCO: $75,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF GUADALUPE CATHOLIC SHCOSTEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY: $46,200 · Other+41 more: $352,865 · Other+41 moreHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $112,500 · Recreation & SportsEL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $75,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $2,500 · Crime & LegalBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $7,602 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $4,500 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · EducationSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON INC: $3,000 · EducationWilliam Marsh Rice University: $2,500 · EducationHOUSTON POLICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesTexas Children's Hospital: $3,000 · HealthThe Rhizome Center for Migrants: $2,500 · InternationalNovum Foundation: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,173,755Recreation & Sports$112,500Crime & Legal$77,500Education$51,102Human Services$5,000Health$3,000International$2,500Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $112,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEL CENTRO DE CORAZON: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $7,602 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5,107 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren At Risk: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Rhizome Center for Migrants: $2,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNovum Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE CORAZON ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of the Incarnate Word ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization La Michoacana Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from La Michoacana Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to La Michoacana Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to La Michoacana Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on La Michoacana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph