Skip to content

· Public charity

Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin

To award grants to religous education and social service institutions.

$1.7M
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$90k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Friends Of Mosdot Goor, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
0
’18
4
’19
1
’20
0
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$165kEducation$122k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $90,118, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,694,451 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,604,333 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$90,118
Median grant
1
States reached
$57k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR$90,118
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%BAIS YAAKOV D'CHASIDEI GUR: $50k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH: $15k → 20%GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR: $15k → 20%ICHUD MOSDOT GUR: $38k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEM: $10k → 20%WE THINK OF LEV LEZULAT: $20k → 20%GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR: $10k → 20%TALMUD TORAH DCHASIDEI GUR: $11k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEM: $10k → 20%FRIENDS OF HARIM: $11k → 20%GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR: $6k → 20%FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $90k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $983k on the FY2023 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$983k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO THE NEEDY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAIS YAAKOV D CHASSIDEI GUR: $50,381 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV D CHASSIDEI GURICHUD MOSDOT GUR: $38,162 · OtherICHUD MOSDOT GURWE THINK OF LEV LEZULAT: $20,383 · OtherWE THINK OF LEV LEZULATAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEM: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMTALMUD TORAH DCHASIDEI GUR: $11,000 · OtherTALMUD TORAH DCHASIDEI GURFRIENDS OF HARIM: $11,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HARIMFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $90,118 · EducationFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOORGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC: $30,500 · ReligionGLOBAL CENTE…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$150,926Education$90,118Religion$30,500Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $90,118 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC: $30,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH: $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BET SHEMESH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Eastlawn Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Lart Charitable Trust · Park Charitable Trust · Westlawn Foundation · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Global Center of Gur Inc · The Kagan Family Foundation Inc · Alternative Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin?

    Find your warmest path to Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $1.1M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kupath Rambahn Kolel Polin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph