Skip to content

· Private foundation

Krupp Smith Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$1.2MEducation$908kInternational$90kReligion$55kCrime & Legal$50kEnvironment$50kRecreation & Sports$40kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$150,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE$100,000
THE KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION$100,000
TROUT UNLIMITED INC$10,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$10,000
THE CHURCH OF ST CLEMENT$10,000
CAMP KESEM AT KU$10,000
CASTING FOR RECOVERY$10,000
THE SHARING PLACE$10,000
RADFORD SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
IL
NY
CT
CA
UT
MO
VA
KS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 16 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$2.2M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+47%

Still filing today

69%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2019–2020 · $758k · revenue +54%
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $700k · revenue +109%
  • RS
    RADFORD SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY ASSOC - ISSA CHARITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • WA
    WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -44%
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAHgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
12
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trout Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Emory University: $758,000 · EducationEmory UniversityThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $100,000 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment Associat…PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $700,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INCTHE SHARING PLACE: $50,000 · HealthTHE SHARING PLACECASTING FOR RECOVERY: $42,500 · Health+2 more: $20,000 · HealthEMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE: $225,000 · OtherEMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF …UTAH INFERTILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $100,000 · OtherUTAH INFERTILITY RESOURCE C…THE CHURCH OF ST CLEMENT: $55,000 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF ST CLEMENTRADFORD SCHOOL INC: $50,000 · OtherRADFORD SCHOOL INCUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM (CANCER CENTER): $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH…INTERNATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY ASSOC - ISSA CHARITIES: $30,000 · OtherCAMP KASEM AT UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $60,000 · Other+6 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $60,000 · InternationalEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,000 · Civil RightsTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $30,000 · AnimalsTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$858,000Health$812,500Other$595,000International$60,000Civil Rights$50,000Animals$30,000Public Safety & Disaster$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmory University: $758,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $700,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH INFERTILITY RESOURCE CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SHARING PLACE: $50,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $42,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN RESPIRATORY CARE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds UTAH INFERTILITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RADFORD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHARING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CASTING FOR RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RESPIRATORY CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krupp Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krupp Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Krupp Smith Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Krupp Smith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krupp Smith Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph