Skip to content

· Private foundation

Krohn Breakthrough Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$700kPublic Safety & Disaster$668kPhilanthropy$383kHuman Services$104kHealth$66kInternational$58kRecreation & Sports$10kEducation$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $800
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUNDANINOS$50,898
GIVEBUTTER$30,000
Individual grant recipient$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $22k → 9%INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF HEARTS: $41k → 11%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $65k → 7%NEW HOPE MINISTRIES: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
WY
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
4
Train the Nations
Religion
5
Vivoblu Water for All

Water for All's mission is to provide access to clean water to people all around the world by donating water filtration systems to those in need. Started in 2020, Water For All ("WFA") is a 501c3 nonprofit that works to serve those in…

Food & Nutrition
6
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
7
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
8
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
9
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
10
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
11
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
12
World Telehealth Initiative

World telehealth initiative provides sustainable medical expertise to the world's most vulnerable communities to build local capacity and advance core health services through a network of volunteer healthcare professionals supported by…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water for People; the most unlike its peers is International Network of Hearts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIED EXTRACT: $700,410 · OtherALLIED EXTRACTCHILDRENS SAFE HAVEN INC: $76,000 · OtherCHILDRENS SAFE HAVEN INCFUNDANINOS: $50,898 · OtherFUNDANINOSGIVEBUTTER: $30,000 · Other+7 more: $28,068 · OtherUKRAINE FREEDOM FUND: $667,500 · Public Safety & DisasterUKRAINE FREEDOM FUNDTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · PhilanthropyTIM TEBOW FOUNDA…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $65,269 · Human ServicesInternational Network of Hearts: $41,002 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $28,030 · Human ServicesUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $5,135 · Human ServicesCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $6,010 · InternationalWATERAID AMERICA INC: $3,126 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $2,030 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLE: $800 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 · Health
Other$885,376Public Safety & Disaster$667,500Philanthropy$300,000Human Services$139,436International$11,966Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUKRAINE FREEDOM FUND: $667,500 over 1y, 35% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $65,269 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Network of Hearts: $41,002 over 1y, 11% of budgetNEW HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $28,030 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $6,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $5,135 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC: $3,126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $2,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krohn Breakthrough Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krohn Breakthrough Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Krohn Breakthrough’s filings →

    More from the funding graph