· Private foundation
Kristine Olsen Private Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY LLS PALM BEACH TREASURE COAST | $7,500 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA | $5,000 |
| HORSE ASSISTED LEARNING & THERAPY | $5,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING & EXPLOITED CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| PALM BEACH COUNTY FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| UMSYLVESTER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CLINIC | $5,000 |
| SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FL | $3,000 |
| LOVING LIFE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM | $3,000 |
| LITTLE STAR FOUNDATION | $2,614 |
| REHABILITATION CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS | $2,000 |
| SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| LITTLE SMILES | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSchool of the Arts Foundation Inc7× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +118%
- JMJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +129%
- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC6× · 2017–2022 · $52k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- SRSMART RIDE TRS ADVENTURESone grant, 2017 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $2k
- CGCHILDREN'S GOLF FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
Empowerment through employment for blind or visually impaired individuals.
The mission of suncoast hospice foundation is to advance the understanding, participation, and support of the mission and programs of suncoast hospice and its affilated organizations, honoring the community's sacred trust through sound…
See schedule o for a complete description of the organization's mission
The mission of the florida center for the blind is to foster hope, confidence and independence in individuals with visual impairments; and to educate the community about preventing vision loss.
Catholic palliative care services, inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of catholic hospice, inc. and under the sponsorship of the archdiocese of miami, provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and dade…
To enable individuals to remain in their homes by supporting compassionate, effective, life-enhancing health and supportive services. at this time, hfk care corporation is inactive.
Disability rights florida advocates, educates, investigates, and litigates to protect and advance the rights, dignity, equal opportunities, self-determination and choices for all people with disabilities.
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
Hospice of martin & st. lucie, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families, dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible. hospice…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Association for Abused Women & Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds School of the Arts Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA OUTREACH CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
- Who funds HOLY GROUND SHELTER FOR HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds Little Smiles Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds LOCKS OF LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Palm Beach County Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION INC ↗
- Who funds Student Aces Inc ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Helen Keller Services ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation Center for Children and Adults Inc ↗
- Who funds LITTLE STAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Olsen Private Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Palm Beach Post Season to Share Inc · Ibis Charities Foundation Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kristine Olsen Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ywca of Palm Beach County — 72% of income from government
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Children's Golf Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kristine Olsen Private Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kristine Olsen Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.