Skip to content
Kpccc Group Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Kpccc Group Inc

To provide occupancy services for related exempt organization which houses emergency shelter and group home for children placed outside their home by alaska department of social services.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.5MHuman Services$483kYouth Development$350kFood & Nutrition$113kEducation$63kHealth$36kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $38,876, the rows itemized in this filing. The $40,051 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,175 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$28,876
Median grant
1
States reached
$473k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MOUNTAIN GROUP$28,876
KENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KENAI SENIOR CONNECTION: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 4 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -50% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$1.7M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-50%

Still filing today

100%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MOUNTAIN GROUP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.6M · 94% of their budget
  • KP
    KENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue -7%
  • BC
    BRIDGES COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • KP
    KENAI PENINSULA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M
  • KP
    KENAI PENINSULA COMMUNITY CARE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $471k · revenue 0% · 100% of their budget
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kenai Peninsula Association of Realtors

To promote public relations and provide education for realtors

—
2
Kenai Peninsula Shooting Association

We offer firearm education, training and safety to the local community.

—
3
Peninsula Housing

A community land trust dedicated to providing secure, affordable housing in leelanau county.

Community Improvement
4
Hospice and Palliative Care-Ko

Provide hospice and palliative care to people in Kodiak Alaska.

Health
5
Kenai Alive

The mission of Kenai Alive! is to change lifestyle behaviors on the Kenai Peninsula. It is also involved and is taking the lead in developing a Health Prevention Network in Kenai.

—
6
Peninsula Senior Center Dba Peninsula Senior Activity Center

The organization provides facilities for senior citizens to engage in group activities including crafts, pinochle, chess, tai chi, bridge, knitting, yoga, quiling, etc. The organization also provides a library.

Human Services
7
South Peninsula Hospital Foundation Inc

South Peninsula Hospital Foundation is a nonprofit 510(c)(3) organization dedicated to the well-being of the people of the Southern Kenai Peninsula and supporting the community healthcare mission of South Peninsula Hospital.

—
8
Greater Ketchikan Chamber Commerce

To encourage and assist in the continued development of existing business, education, and life in ketchikan.

—
9
Kenai Peninsula Housing Initiatives Inc

To provide safe affordable housing options to the low income and special needs residents of the kenai peninsula.

Housing & Shelter
10
Ketchikan Committee for the Homeless Inc

Provide temporary shelter for the homeless of ketchikan ak. the shelter serves as a temporary place for shelter, not a permanent residence. served appoximately 200 individuals.

—
11
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
12
Snohomish Community Food Bank

To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kenai Peninsula Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Salamatof Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENAI PENINSULA FOUNDATION: $1,529,000 · OtherKENAI PENINSULA FOUNDATIONKENAI PENINSULA COMMUNITY CARE CENTER: $470,987 · OtherKENAI PENINSULA COMMUNITY CARE CENTERBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA: $350,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA+5 more: $124,885 · OtherTHE MOUNTAIN GROUP: $1,564,001 · Housing & ShelterTHE MOUNTAIN GROUP+1 more: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterKENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC: $100,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $2,500 · Food & NutritionBRIDGES COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropySALAMATOF FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL PENINSULA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $29,000 · HealthPENINSULA ART GUILD: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKenai Senior Connection Inc: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$2,474,872Housing & Shelter$1,584,001Food & Nutrition$102,500Philanthropy$41,000Health$29,000Arts & Culture$5,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MOUNTAIN GROUP: $1,564,001 over 2y, 94% of budgetKENAI PENINSULA COMMUNITY CARE CENTER: $470,987 over 1y, 100% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE KENAI PENINSULA: $350,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetKENAI PENINSULA FOOD BANK INC: $100,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBRIDGES COMMUNITY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRAL PENINSULA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $29,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKENAI PENINSULA HOMELESSNESS COALITION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSoldotna Chamber of Commerce: $13,750 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CENTRAL PENINSULA INC: $6,535 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSALAMATOF FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetPENINSULA ART GUILD: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNINILCHIK SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKenai Senior Connection Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationThe Alaska Community …Central Peninsula Gen…Amazonsmile Foundation
Rasmuson FoundationAK21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Central Peninsula General Hospital Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kpccc Group Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kpccc Group Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kpccc Group Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kpccc Group Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kpccc Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home