Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Koscielny Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

International$436kFood & Nutrition$387kReligion$381kHousing & Shelter$210kHuman Services$210kArts & Culture$103kHealth$43kCrime & Legal$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $100
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH OLMSTED UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR INC$10,000
RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$10,000
WORLD VISION$10,000
PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 8%PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL: $10k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $45k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 22%COUNTY LINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WAYNEHOLMES: $50k → 10%OHIO GUIDESTONE: $15k → 17%PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 8%PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL: $10k → 14%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $25k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $45k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 22%OHIO GUIDESTONE: $15k → 17%PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $40k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 22%PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $20k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $20k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40k → 22%PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $15k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $20k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $20k → 22%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $10k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $10k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $20k → 22%THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $40k → 17%FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $10k → 13%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10k → 22%THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $40k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $40k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $40k → 17%THE SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $40k → 17%GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $52k → 17%GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $40k → 17%GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $40k → 17%GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $25k → 17%GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK: $20k → 17%RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $60k → 17%RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50k → 17%RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50k → 17%RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $40k → 17%RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 17%RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 17%NORTH OLMSTED UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50k → 17%NORTH OLMSTED UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 14 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$1.6M
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+30%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $197k · revenue +32%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $115k · revenue +89%
  • O
    OhioGuidestone
    5× · 2018–2022 · $43k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CL
    COUNTY LINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WAYNE-HOLMES
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -76% · 75% of their budget
  • WS
    WEST SHORE FAMILY YMCA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
4
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
5
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
6
Project Concern International

Pci is a global development organization that drives innovation from the ground up to enhance health end hunger, overcome hardship and advance women & girls-resulting in meaningful and measurable change in people's lives.

International
7
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
8
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
9
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
12
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is County Line Historical Society of Wayne-Holmes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $255,000 · OtherRIDGEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $210,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYTHE SALVATION ARMY — $200,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYNORTH OLMSTED UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherNORTH OLMSTED UNITED METHODIST CHURCH+6 more — $59,800 · Other+6 moreWORLD VISION INC — $195,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $190,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $115,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $115,000 · InternationalPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL+1 more — $11,000 · InternationalGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $197,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEV…PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC — $52,500 · Arts & CultureCOUNTY LINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WAYNE-HOLMES — $50,000 · Arts & CultureOhioGuidestone — $42,500 · HealthBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $25,000 · Crime & LegalNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $100 · Civil Rights
Other$824,800International$626,000Food & Nutrition$197,000Arts & Culture$102,500Health$42,500Crime & Legal$25,000Civil Rights$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $197,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $195,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $115,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL — $115,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC — $52,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCOUNTY LINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WAYNE-HOLMES — $50,000 over 1y, 75% of budgetOhioGuidestone — $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED — $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds PARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds COUNTY LINE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WAYNE-HOLMES
  • Who funds OhioGuidestone
  • Who funds BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
  • Who funds CHILDREN INCORPORATED
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Koscielny Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph