Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kohler Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
147
Grants FY2025still arriving
18
States reached
$5.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$55MArts & Culture$37MEducation$4.8MScience & Tech$129kPhilanthropy$125kYouth Development$95kRecreation & Sports$68kHuman Services$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 147 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k85 grants · $442k
  • $10k–50k52 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $556k
  • $250k+4 grants · $7.0M
$7,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$486M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER$5,911,803
JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER$510,042
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON$289,267
LAKESHORE ADVANTAGE SCHOLARSHIP GRANT$250,000
JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER$169,850
JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER$112,000
RACINE ART MUSEUM$90,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY ART GALLERIES$79,350
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - TWIN CITI$54,375
JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER$50,000
Individual grant recipient$47,986
RACINE ART MUSEUM$42,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - LACROSSE$37,500
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$35,500
MIDWEST MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE FOX VALLEY: $2k → 6%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOX VALLEY: $1k → 7%FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $3k → 10%TRUSTFULLY INC: $1k → 17%BLACK AMERICAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $3k → 9%BLACK AMERICAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $2k → 9%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN: $2k → 17%DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF WISCONSIN: $1k → 17%WE EMPOWHER INC: $2k → 9%FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG: $2k → 9%HMONG MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $7k → 9%BLACK-AMERICAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $5k → 9%BLACK-AMERICAN COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $3k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC: $3k → 9%FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $2k → 9%FRIENDS OF THE SENIOR ACTIVITI CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 175 repeat orgs$79M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

175 repeat relationships: 80 still active in FY2025, 95 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

175
238

Total granted

$27M
$78M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+16%

Still filing today

62%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $795k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    3× · 2021–2023 · $221k · revenue +43%
  • MS
    MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +6%
  • ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $139k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • KT
    KOHLER TRUST FOR CLEAN WATERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $54M · revenue ×34
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF DICKEYVILLE GROTTO INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7.6M
  • TL
    THE LOUIS ROUND WILSON LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $3.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Wesleyan University

Wesleyan university is dedicated to providing an education in liberal arts by building a diverse, energetic community of students, faculty, and staff who value independence of mind and generosity of spirit. see additional description in…

Education
7
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
8
Lawrence University of Wisconsin

Lawrence university of wisconsin, through its undergraduate residential college and conservatory of music, educates students in the liberal arts and sciences. the university is devoted to excellence and integrity in all of its activities…

Education
9
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
10
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
11
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Black American Community Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

210 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 210 of the 466 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
208/210
Grantees still filing
148/210
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOHLER TRUST FOR CLEAN WATER: $53,690,000 · EnvironmentKOHLER TRUST FOR CLEAN WATER+1 more: $1,066,191 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF DICKEYVILLE GROTTO INC: $7,625,617 · OtherFRIENDS OF DICKEYVILLE GROT…THE LOUIS ROUND WILSON LIBRARY: $3,030,080 · OtherTHE LOUIS ROUND WILSON LIBR…LOUIS ROUND WILSON LIBRARY AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $2,746,642 · OtherLOUIS ROUND WILSON LIBRARY …FREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,069,927 · OtherFREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL …RACINE ART MUSEUM: $1,110,570 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - MADISON: $873,623 · Other+108 more: $7,463,874 · Other+108 moreJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $12,871,392 · Arts & CultureJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ART…5 4 7 ARTS CENTER: $4,266,121 · Arts & Culture5 4 7 ARTS CENTERARTS FOUNDATION OF KOSCIUSKO INC: $872,650 · Arts & Culture+34 more: $3,356,060 · Arts & Culture+34 moreMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $415,180 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $220,890 · EducationST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $139,175 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $136,250 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGE: $109,670 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $104,167 · EducationRIPON COLLEGE: $99,275 · Education+37 more: $1,690,377 · EducationVOLLAND FOUNDATION INC: $120,600 · PhilanthropyBROWN UNIVERSITY: $51,667 · Community ImprovementNorthwestern University: $29,595 · Recreation & Sports
Environment$54,756,191Other$24,920,333Arts & Culture$21,366,223Education$2,914,984Philanthropy$120,600Community Improvement$51,667Recreation & Sports$29,595

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $12,871,392 over 6y, 20% of budget5 4 7 ARTS CENTER: $4,266,121 over 3y, 27% of budgetNIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE ARE: $1,066,191 over 1y, 70% of budgetMISSISSIPPI MUSEUM OF ART INC: $547,865 over 1y, 10% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC: $415,180 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUTAH ARTS ALLIANCE: $369,250 over 1y, 15% of budgetFULLER CRAFT MUSEUM INC: $366,175 over 1y, 23% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $246,300 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART: $234,409 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $220,890 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHECKSCHER MUSEUM: $155,240 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $149,764 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $139,175 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $136,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC: $124,226 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVOLLAND FOUNDATION INC: $120,600 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $112,019 over 1y, 16% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $109,670 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCKFORD ART MUSEUM: $107,633 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $105,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $104,167 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRIPON COLLEGE: $99,275 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $91,596 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $84,998 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $81,078 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMarquette University: $80,625 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $78,582 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $78,125 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $77,926 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC: $77,900 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY: $76,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMINT MUSEUM OF ART INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetButler University: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $67,375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $58,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $52,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $51,667 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetColumbia College Chicago: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $48,173 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $47,900 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFairfield University: $47,151 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $46,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $42,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKNOXVILLE MUSEUM OF ART: $40,195 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOHLER TRUST FOR CLEAN WATER ↗
  • Who funds JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds 5 4 7 ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FREEBORN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA FALLS NATIONAL HERITAGE ARE ↗
  • Who funds ARTS FOUNDATION OF KOSCIUSKO INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FULLER CRAFT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BEND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HECKSCHER MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE INSTITUTE OF ART & DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI90.4× affinity57 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Wm Collins Kohler Foundation Inc · Hayssen Family Foundation Inc · Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc · Rdk Foundation · Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Humanities Council Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kohler Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kohler Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The American Visionary Art Museum Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Washington County Museum of Fine Arts: 2% of income from government
  • Fuller Craft Museum Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Orlando Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Southern College: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kohler Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kohler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 466 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kohler’s filings →

More from the funding graph