Skip to content

· Private foundation

Koh-Lee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$509kEducation$40kHealth$29kArts & Culture$15kInternational$9kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$6kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
7
States reached
$361k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOW INCOME HOUSING INITIATIVE$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
MARY'S PLACE$1,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN (TO GAZA CRISIS)$900
OXFAM - CHILDREN OF GAZA AND ISRAEL EMERGENCY APPEAL$900
CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING$500
CHINESE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION$500
DEMOCRACY FORWARD$500
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$500
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY FAMILY BUSINESS SCHOOL$400
CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICE CENTER$200
KCTS 9 AKA CASCADE PBS$200
KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO$200
BELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY$200
SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%University District Food Bank: $1k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $250 → 9%Chinese Information & Service Center: $5k → 9%Chief Seattle Club: $800 → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICE CENTER: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
CT
CA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 17 repeat orgs$593k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
73

Total granted

$59k
$588k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+22%

Still filing today

65%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM
    2× · 2020–2023 · $31k · revenue +11%
  • MP
    Maris Place
    5× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +80%
  • CI
    Chinese Information and Service Center
    2× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • UE
    UW Engineering endowed professorship
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • AH
    ASIAN HEALTH FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
3
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
4
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Washington

To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights, and to take action to further those liberties and rights within the state of washington.

—
6
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
10
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
11
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
12
American Civil Liberties Union of Washington Found

To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights, and to take action to further those liberties and rights within the state of washington.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Public Library Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Horizons Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UW Engineering endowed professorship: $500,000 · OtherUW Engineering endowed professorship+79 more: $90,267 · Other+79 morePAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $30,500 · Education+4 more: $2,975 · EducationMaris Place: $10,310 · Youth DevelopmentChinese Information and Service Center: $5,200 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $800 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE: $250 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $667 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $375 · HealthPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $1,425 · Civil RightsChinese for Affirmative Action: $925 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $666 · Civil RightsFoundation for International Understanding Through: $1,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $750 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 · International
Other$590,267Education$33,475Youth Development$10,310Human Services$7,250Health$6,042Civil Rights$3,016International$2,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $30,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMaris Place: $10,310 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetChinese Information and Service Center: $5,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $2,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $1,425 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBABIES OF HOMELESSNESS: $1,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJubilee REACH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for International Understanding Through: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHAVEN: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND: $667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLARD FOOD BANK: $667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $666 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc: $666 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMOCRACY FORWARD: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $425 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $425 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHCARE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗
  • Who funds Chinese Information and Service Center ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds BABIES OF HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds HORIZONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jubilee REACH ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for International Understanding Through ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Koh-Lee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Koh-Lee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Koh-Lee’s filings →

More from the funding graph