Skip to content
Knights of Columbus Foundation of Oklahoma at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus Foundation of Oklahoma

Provides operating funds for the center of family love, a non-profit organization which operates a residential facility for mentally retarded adults and makes contributions to other catholic organizations

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$451kPublic Safety & Disaster$88kReligion$28kYouth Development$14kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $69,640, the rows itemized in this filing. The $71,840 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$12,140
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE$42,500
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES$12,140
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $117k → 9%THE COTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE: $28k → 14%Center of Family Love: $91k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $43k → 9%Center of Family Love: $36k → 9%Pregnancy Resource Center: $14k → 15%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $32k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 4 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$386k
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-23%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Center of Family Love
    5× · 2021–2025 · $318k · revenue +32%
  • HP
    HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k
  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $22k · revenue -39%

Funded once

  • WP
    WILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue 0%
  • CO
    COTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE INC A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue -31%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN OK
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
2
Pregnancy Care Center of Wayne County Inc

Offer pregnancy test, abstinence programs , post-abortion bible studies, assistance with material need, first trimester ultrasounds, mens mentoring program, parenting classes.services are free and confidential with focus in wayne co oh…

Health
3
Cross Timbers Pregnancy Care Center

Cross timbers pregnancy care center is a christian ministry dedicated to preserving the value of human life by providing abortion alternatives, practical assistance, and education to the cross timbers area.

Health
4
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
5
Lifes Options Pregnancy Center

Lifes optins pregnancy center is a christian non profit ministry that exists to help pregnant women before, during and after pregnancy with pregnancy tests, ultrasounds and support, parenting classes and free baby items from kids closet.

Health
6
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
7
Agape Women's Services

Womens Services is a Gospel-centered,life-affirming medical clinic for the Johnson City area that provides free services to women, including pregnancy and STI testing, sexual health consultations, and limited ultrasounds. We also provide…

Health
8
Northwest Arkansas Women's Resources

Loving choices pregnancy centers of nwa is here to provide outstanding counseling and limited medical services to our clients as they might be facing a crisis in their reproductive health, such as an unplanned pregnancy or a sexually…

—
9
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
10
Crisis Pregnancy Center

Develop and administer programs designed to assist women in confronting and dealing with the spiritual, physical, emotional, economic and social problems associated with pregnancy.

Health
11
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
12
A Beacon of Light Pregnancy Help Center

A Beacon of Light is a life-affirming organization based on Catholic spirituality called to support families facing an unplanned pregnancy or any pregnancy loss, including abortion.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crossroads Clinic an Open Door for Life Choices Inc; the most unlike its peers is Knights of Columbus Charities of Kentucky Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Center of Family Love: $317,814 · Human ServicesThe Center of Family LoveCOTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE INC A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $27,625 · Human ServicesCOTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE INC A NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF OWASSO: $14,299 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN OK: $27,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN O…HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER: $24,867 · OtherHOPE PREGNANCY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $20,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNBC BANK: $20,400 · OtherNBC BANKDIOCESE OF TULSA: $15,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF TULSAOKLAHOMA STATE COUNCIL: $14,052 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,125 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHICKASAW COMMUNITY BANK: $7,875 · OtherTennessee State Council of Knights of Columbus: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $34,800 · Arts & CultureKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $22,140 · Community ImprovementCrossroads Clinic An Open Door for Life Choices Inc: $19,664 · HealthLouisiana Knights of Columbus Charities Inc: $7,500 · ReligionKnights of Columbus Charities of Kentucky Inc: $5,000 · Religion
Human Services$359,738Other$171,569Arts & Culture$34,800Community Improvement$22,140Health$19,664Religion$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Center of Family Love: $317,814 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWILLOW PREGNANCY SUPPORT INC: $34,800 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE INC A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $27,625 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC: $22,140 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCrossroads Clinic An Open Door for Life Choices Inc: $19,664 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF OWASSO: $14,299 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLouisiana Knights of Columbus Charities Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetKnights of Columbus Charities of Kentucky Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Butterfield Memorial …Knights of Columbus C…Amazonsmile Foundation
Butterfield Memorial FoundationOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Butterfield Memorial Foundation · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Foundation of Oklahoma funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Knights of Columbus Foundation of Oklahoma. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Knights of Columbus Foundation of Oklahoma?

    Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus Foundation of Oklahoma through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Knights of Columbus Foundation of Oklahoma’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home