Skip to content
Knight Intentions Today & Tomorrow Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Knight Intentions Today & Tomorrow Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$32kHealth$24kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$4kHuman Services$3kInternational$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$436k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Thomas Church$7,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BRIDGE HOUSE INC: $7k → 9%BRIDGE HOUSE INC: $5k → 9%Bridge House Inc: $4k → 9%Bridge House: $3k → 9%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 9%SILVER SOURCE: $1k → 9%SILVER SOURCE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61k · 11 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$61k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+78%

Still filing today

45%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +8%
  • MH
    MALTA HOUSE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +85%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SILVERSOURCE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • ST
    St Thomas Catholic Church
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • BR
    BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +9%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
2
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
4
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
5
Bridgeport Hospital Foundation Inc

To support bridgeport hospital by, in large part, fundraising, and further, to fund and promote activities of the yale new haven health system, the integrated health care delivery system of which it is a part.

Health
6
Bon Secours New York Health System Inc

Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.

—
7
Stella Maris Inc

In the tradition of the sisters of mercy, stella maris provides a comprehensive range of health and housing services for the compassionate care of the elderly, the sick and the dying.

—
8
Seton Health At Schuyler Ridge Residential Healthcare

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. seton health at schuyler ridge residential healthcare (schuyler…

Health
9
Bridgewater Village Inc

Retirement housing

Housing & Shelter
10
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
12
Techbridge Inc

Techbridge breaks the cycle of generational poverty through the innovative use of technology to transform nonprofit and community impact. techbridge's work is focused on four pillars: hunger relief, homeless support, social justice and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Silversource Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST THOMAS CHURCH: $15,200 · OtherST THOMAS CHURCHDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY: $5,500 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF CHARITYSt Thomas Catholic Church: $5,300 · OtherSt Thomas Catholic ChurchST THOMAS - CT DIOCESE: $4,350 · OtherST THOMAS - CT DIOCESEST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITALHOME FOR THE BRAVE: $3,000 · OtherHOME FOR THE BRAVEIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherST THOMAS -- PROJECT APPALACHIA: $1,500 · Other+4 more: $4,000 · Other+4 moreBRIDGE HOUSE INC: $18,600 · Human ServicesBRIDGE HOUSE INCFRIENDS OF SILVERSOURCE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF SILVERSOURCE INCBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INCOPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $3,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,500 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationMERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC: $1,500 · EducationMALTA HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterFoundations in Education Inc: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$43,350Human Services$22,100Health$4,500Education$3,500Housing & Shelter$2,500Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIDGE HOUSE INC: $18,600 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetOPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMALTA HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF SILVERSOURCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundations in Education Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIDGE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds MALTA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SILVERSOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundations in Education Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Knight Intentions Today & Tomorrow Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Knight Intentions Today & Tomorrow Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Bridge House Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Knight Intentions Today & Tomorrow’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home