Skip to content
Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$126kHuman Services$104kReligion$78kArts & Culture$61kHousing & Shelter$36kHealth$28kFood & Nutrition$23kEducation$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOREVER LEARNING INSTITUTE INC$5,000
HEROES CAMP INC$5,000
CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING I$5,000
UNITY GARDENS INC$5,000
VILLAGE COMMUNITY MUSICAL ARTS ALLIANCE$5,000
HAROLD W MCMILLEN CENTER FOR HEALTH$4,000
SOUTH BEND YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS INC$4,000
THE PRESERVATION OF THE RES$4,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA$4,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB N INDIANA CORRIDOR$3,500
UNITED HEALTH SERVICES$3,000
OHANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION$3,000
NEW DAY INTAKE CENTER$3,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SOUTH BEND$2,500
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF SOUTH BEND INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY OF ST JOSEPH C: $5k → 13%REAL SERVICES INC: $5k → 13%THE LGBTQ CENTER INC: $3k → 13%NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $2k → 13%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $10k → 13%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $10k → 13%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $5k → 13%CULTIVATING LIFE INC: $5k → 13%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $5k → 13%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $5k → 13%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $4k → 13%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
SD
IN
CO
VA
MD
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$358k · 26 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
27

Total granted

$358k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+17%

Still filing today

69%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +11%
  • HC
    HEROES CAMP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +13%
  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +233%
  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DISPENSARY AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +30%
  • TV
    THE VILLAGE A COMMUNITY MUSICAL ARTS ALL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Theatre of Southern Indiana Inc

Children's theatre of southern indiana is committed to providing a nurturing and inclusive educational and performance experience for all children and teens through the transformative power of theatre.

Arts & Culture
2
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
3
Beacon Inc

Beacon, inc, (beacon) is a solutions-driven, anti-poverty nonprofit, dedicated to aiding and empowering people experiencing extreme poverty, especially hunger and homelessness. based in bloomington, in, beacon provides six core programs;…

Education
4
New Life Ministries Indiana Inc

To serve those in need of food, shelter, and a purpose-filled life.

Food & Nutrition
5
Southern in Housing & Community Development Corp

To enhance and develop the social, economic, and physical resources of communities around indiana and their residents; to improve the quality of housing and assist in the development of employment opportunities particularly for persons of…

Housing & Shelter
6
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
7
Neighborhood House Inc

Neighborhood house is a whole-family community center located in louisville's west end. our mission is to support families by creating a community of opportunity. together with our members, we connect to one another and to resources, break…

Human Services
8
St Nicholas Neighbor in Need Corporatio Corporation

Exempt purpose:to provide quality of life improvements to people in the indianapolis area who experience great difficulties in their life due to a handicap, disability, long term illness, accident or other life difficulty.

Human Services
9
Society of St Vincent De Paul Archdiocesan Council of Indianapolis Inc

The society of st vincent de paul (archdiocesan council of indianapolis) provides support services and supplies to individuals and families in need, without discrimination. its operations rely heavily on volunteers, and donations come from…

Religion
10
Lifesteps Inc

Helping individuals and families with life's changing needs by providing programs and services which will improve their quality of life.

Education
11
Little Knights Learning Center La Porte City Campus

The mission of little knights learning center - la porte city campus is to support and grow the community by providing high quality, easily accessible, and affordable child care. our work will benefit the community in meaningful ways and…

Human Services
12
New Hope of Indiana Inc

New hope of indiana, inc. is a leader in providing holistic services and resources to persons with disabilities and their families while advocating to advance the opportunities for those in need of support.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of St Joseph County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bright Beginnings Family Childcare Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
21/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAUL'S MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST: $45,000 · OtherST PAUL'S MEMORIAL UNITED METHODISTLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $20,000 · OtherLA CASA DE AMISTAD INCBOOKS 4 KIDS PROGRAM: $15,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $12,500 · OtherACTING ENSEMBLE: $10,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $12,750 · Other+35 more: $144,500 · Other+35 moreYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICE…THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $15,750 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST CH…REAL SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesREAL SERVICES…ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE…CULTIVATING LIFE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCULTIVATING L…THE LGBTQ CENTER INC: $2,500 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesHEROES CAMP INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEROES CAMP…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GI…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS…FIVE STAR LIFE INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIVE STAR L…O'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · HealthHAROLD W MCMILLEN CENTER FOR HEALTH EDUCATION INC: $8,000 · HealthNEW DAY INTAKE CENTER: $6,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S DISPENSARY AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthGIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA: $24,000 · Crime & LegalTHE VILLAGE A COMMUNITY MUSICAL ART ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationFOREVER LEARNING INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 · EducationBRIGHT BEGINNINGS FAMILY CHILDCARE INC: $4,000 · EducationCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $15,000 · EmploymentALLIANCE INC: $4,500 · Employment
Other$289,750Human Services$60,250Youth Development$51,500Health$32,000Crime & Legal$24,000Education$24,000Employment$19,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHEROES CAMP INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN MICHIANA: $24,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetLA CASA DE AMISTAD INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $15,750 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetO'HANA HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC: $12,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $12,500 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetACTING ENSEMBLE: $10,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE VILLAGE A COMMUNITY MUSICAL ART ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BEACON RESOURCE CENTER INC: $9,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAROLD W MCMILLEN CENTER FOR HEALTH EDUCATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFIVE STAR LIFE INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH BEND YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS: $8,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN IN INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW DAY INTAKE CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S DISPENSARY AND HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPOTAWATOMI ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOREVER LEARNING INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetALLIANCE INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESERVATION OF THE RES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS FAMILY CHILDCARE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt Margarets House: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FISCHOFF NATIONAL CHAMBER MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LGBTQ CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOOSIERS FEEDING THE HUNGRY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIANA FAMILY CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEAR NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carroll F V Char Tr-M…Muessel Ellison Mem I…Community Foundation …Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd …Fields Foundation Irr…Judd Leighton Foundat…The Pokagon Fund Inc1st Source Bank Found…United Way of St Jose…Asante Foundation IncUniversity of Notre D…Everwise Foundation I…
Carroll F V Char Tr-MainMO72.7× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Muessel Ellison Mem Irr Tua · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Clark Sa & Fp Mem Fd Irr Tua · Fields Foundation Irr Tua · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · The Pokagon Fund Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · United Way of St Joseph County Inc · Asante Foundation Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Everwise Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Alliance Inc: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Klockow Harvey R and Doris Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home