Skip to content

· Private foundation

Klaus Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$771k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$672k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of Klaus Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
3
’18
3
’19
1
’21
1
’22
4
’23
4
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.6MEducation$1.3MScience & Tech$87kArts & Culture$55kEnvironment$51kInternational$10kAnimals$10kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $672k
$18,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$672,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$50,000
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION$18,000
ARCH$10,800
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT$10,000
D3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAUNCH INC: $12k → 10%DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE: $10k → 14%ART CENTER SARASOTA: $10k → 9%404 DAO INC: $50k → 8%ARCH: $11k → 8%D3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 9%CITY SPRINGS THEATRE COMPANY: $5k → 13%SIERRA CLUB: $51k → 14%SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $10k → 16%ARCS ATLANTA: $5k → 18%NMF: $25k → 9%ART CENTER SARASOTA: $10k → 9%404 DAO: $37k → 8%ARCH: $8k → 8%ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $100k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%CITY SPRINGS: $5k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $3k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%CITY SPRINGS THEATER COMPANY: $5k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER: $25k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%CHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $436k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $436k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $18k → 13%GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%GT FOUNDATION FUNDING CORPORATION: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$1.4M
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+45%

Still filing today

63%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureScience & TechHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $945k · revenue +116%
  • AI
    ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $103k · revenue +23%
  • AC
    ART CENTER SARASOTA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SC
    SIERRA CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $51k
  • EU
    Emory University
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +16%
  • RW
    ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Berggruen Institute
Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
7
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is D3 Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $3,608,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $944,500 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION …ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $102,984 · EducationATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SC…Emory University: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationEMORY UNIVERSITY: $160,000 · OtherSIERRA CLUB: $51,000 · OtherNMF: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT: $20,000 · OtherARCH: $18,300 · OtherLAUNCH INC: $11,500 · Other+4 more: $25,030 · Other404 DAO INC: $87,000 · Science & TechROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureART CENTER SARASOTA INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCity Springs Theatre: $10,045 · Arts & CultureD3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthDefenders of Wildlife: $10,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$3,608,000Education$1,107,484Other$310,830Science & Tech$87,000Arts & Culture$55,045Health$10,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $3,608,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $944,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $102,984 over 2y, 0.2% of budget404 DAO INC: $87,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetEmory University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART CENTER SARASOTA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCity Springs Theatre: $10,045 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetD3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds 404 DAO INC ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER SARASOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds City Springs Theatre ↗
  • Who funds D3 RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Savannah College of Art and DesignInc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Klaus Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Klaus Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Klaus Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph