Skip to content
Kiwanis Club of Patchogue Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kiwanis Club of Patchogue Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$240kFood & Nutrition$63kHealth$56kRecreation & Sports$13kScience & Tech$10kHuman Services$9kCivil Rights$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$6,671
Median grant
1
States reached
$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAT-MED KEY CLUB$25,870
Individual grant recipient$24,593
HOLIDAY FOOD BASKETS$6,671
USING OUR VOICES FOUNDATION INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,450
PSI LOVE YOU DAY INC$2,676
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%PATCHOGUE MEDFORD YOUTH SERVICES: $2k → 7%PATCHOGUE YOUTH AND COMMUNITY SVCS: $2k → 7%PATCHOGUE YOUTH AND COMMUNITY SVCS: $1k → 7%PATCHOGUE YOUTH AND COMMUNITY SVCS: $800 → 7%PATCHOGUE YOUTH AND COMMUNITY SVCS: $200 → 7%PATCHOGUE YOUTH AND COMMUNITY SVCS: $150 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$520k · 22 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
19

Total granted

$520k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+99%

Still filing today

32%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MORICHES ROTARY HEALTH CAMP INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $8k · revenue +29%
  • PM
    Patchogue Medford Youth & Community Services Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +11%
  • TM
    The Ministry for Hope Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • PV
    PATCHOGUE VILLAGE CAMPERSHIPS
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • PA
    PATCHOGUE AMBULANCE
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mayo Home for Youth Development Inc

Mayo Home for Youth provides a home for an average of 16 young male individuals providing food, shelter and supervision 24/7

Human Services
2
Marys Homes Inc

Recovery home

Housing & Shelter
3
Mikes Place a non-profit recovery house
Health
4
House of Hope

We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.

Human Services
5
Hope House Inc
Youth Development
6
Jacobs House Recovery Center
Health
7
Hearts of Hope Inc

Caring for Homeless Youth

Human Services
8
Joshuas Mission of Hope Inc

Giving hope to disadvantaged children

Education
9
Marys House of Restoration

Marys house mission is to provide transitional living environment which provides residential care, individual and group counceling, assessment

—
10
Sunshine for Humanity Inc

Homeless Shelter

Health
11
The Jesse Maali House of Mercy Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
12
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryhaven Center of Hope Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joshua Butzke Memorial Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAT-MED KEY CLUB: $152,628 · OtherPAT-MED KEY CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $118,419 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $69,035 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLIDAY FOOD BASKETS: $62,727 · OtherHOLIDAY FOOD BASKETSCROHNS COLITIS FOUNDATION: $39,000 · OtherCROHNS COLITIS FOUNDATION+29 more: $85,598 · Other+29 morePatchogue Medford Youth & Community Services Inc: $5,960 · Human ServicesPS I LOVE YOU DAY INC: $5,101 · PhilanthropyJoshua Butzke Memorial Foundation Inc: $250 · PhilanthropySPOTLIGHT ON CHILDREN INC: $650 · Youth DevelopmentOUR COMMUNITY SALUTES USA INC: $250 · Youth DevelopmentMercy Haven Inc: $650 · Housing & ShelterEILEENS HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS: $500 · Food & NutritionWilliam Floyd Community Summit: $250 · Community Improvement
Other$527,407Human Services$5,960Philanthropy$5,351Youth Development$900Housing & Shelter$650Food & Nutrition$500Community Improvement$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORICHES ROTARY HEALTH CAMP INC: $7,665 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPatchogue Medford Youth & Community Services Inc: $5,960 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPS I LOVE YOU DAY INC: $5,101 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetThe Ministry for Hope Inc: $2,885 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARYHAVEN CENTER OF HOPE INC: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Haven Inc: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPOTLIGHT ON CHILDREN INC: $650 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetEILEENS HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS: $500 over 1y, 11% of budgetJoshua Butzke Memorial Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORICHES ROTARY HEALTH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Patchogue Medford Youth & Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds PS I LOVE YOU DAY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ministry for Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARYHAVEN CENTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPOTLIGHT ON CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds EILEENS HOME FOR THE HOLIDAYS ↗
  • Who funds William Floyd Community Summit ↗
  • Who funds Joshua Butzke Memorial Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OUR COMMUNITY SALUTES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA2.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiwanis Club of Patchogue Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiwanis Club of Patchogue Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kiwanis Club of Patchogue Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kiwanis Club of Patchogue Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiwanis Club of Patchogue’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home