Skip to content
Kitty Angels Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kitty Angels Inc

Kitty angels primary mission has always been to help the cats that need assistance the most - the ferals,the strays, the homeless and injured - by fixing them and finding them a place to spend a safe and happy life.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$205kPublic Benefit$20kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$18,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$660k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERATION SOS$35,000
GUARDIAN ANGEL$25,000
NEW ARC$18,000
LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEW ARC: $18k → 8%GALS BEST PAL: $5k → 10%OPERATION SOS: $20k → 15%OPERATION SOS: $35k → 11%SUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 13%ON THE WING: $10k → 11%SECOND CHANCE FOR CATS: $7k → 21%UNION COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 14%NEW ARC: $10k → 8%OPERATION SOS: $25k → 11%ON THE WING: $2k → 11%UNION COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 14%NEW ARC: $10k → 8%OPERATION SOS: $15k → 11%LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 8%OPERATION SOS: $15k → 11%NEW ARC: $5k → 8%LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $12k → 8%GUARDIAN ANGEL: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 3 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$145k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-19%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OPERATION STERILIZATON OUTREACH SVC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +55%
  • NE
    NORTH EAST WILDLIFE ANIMAL REHABILITATION COALITION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +19% · 92% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k

Funded once

  • OS
    OPERATION SOS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • SH
    SUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -95%
  • UC
    UNION COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pet Organization Urging Neutering Care & Education

Rescue and rehome abandoned cats and kittens.

Animals
2
Second Chance Animal Rescue
Animals
3
Paws & Claws Humane Society

Animal shelter and humane society.

Animals
4
The Animal Awareness Society

Animal spay & neuter, adoptions, etc.

Animals
5
Luckys Little Rescue

Animal Rescue

Animals
6
Tlc Pet Rescue Inc

Animal Rescue from local kill shelters and owner surrenders. Activities include vetting spay neuter boarding transport adoption and screening of adopters.

Animals
7
Sunny Oasis Rescue

Pet rescue and adoption services

Animals
8
Sunrise Rescue

To provide rescue services to animals. providing medical care, adoption, transportation, spay, neuter and vaccination services, and to provide animal curelty prevention.

Animals
9
Saving Animals in Need Today

Cat care and cat adoption - intake homeless owner surrendered cats provide them with veterinary care feed and house them until adopted

Animals
10
Red River County Humane Society

Animal rescueadoption and spayneuter

Animals
11
Helping Animals Live Tomorrow Rescue

We are an animal rescue whose large ambitions include rescuing homeless dogs and cats, providing them with medical attention and most importantly, finding them the loving homes they deserve.

Animals
12
Adopt a Pet

Animal pet awareness

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gals Best Pal Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Lowell Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERATION STERILIZATON OUTREACH SVC: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterOPERATION STERILIZATON OUTREACH SVCNORTH EAST WILDLIFE ANIMAL REHABILITATION COALITION INC: $43,000 · OtherNORTH EAST WILDLIFE ANIMAL REHABILIT…OPERATION SOS: $20,000 · OtherOPERATION SOSIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSECOND CHANCE FOR CATS INC: $7,100 · OtherSECOND CHANCE FOR CATS INCLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $27,000 · AnimalsLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETYGUARDIAN ANGELS CAT RESCUE INC: $25,000 · AnimalsGUARDIAN ANGELS CAT RESCUE INCSUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · AnimalsSUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY INCUNION COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $8,395 · AnimalsUNION COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYGALS BEST PAL INCORPORATED: $5,000 · AnimalsGALS BEST PAL INCORPORATED
Housing & Shelter$90,000Other$82,100Animals$80,395

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPERATION STERILIZATON OUTREACH SVC: $90,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetNORTH EAST WILDLIFE ANIMAL REHABILITATION COALITION INC: $43,000 over 4y, 92% of budgetLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $27,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGELS CAT RESCUE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetSUNRISE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSECOND CHANCE FOR CATS INC: $7,100 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGALS BEST PAL INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kitty Angels Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kitty Angels Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kitty Angels’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home