Skip to content
Kinman-Oldfield Fam Fdn Tr at a glance

· Private foundation

Kinman-Oldfield Fam Fdn Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$234k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$119k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.6MPhilanthropy$145kArts & Culture$31kHealth$22kRecreation & Sports$3k
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $119k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$118,750
SUTTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
CEDAR BLUFFS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
ADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$5,000
OAKLANDCRAIG PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$5,000
SYRACUSE FOUNDATION$5,000
NORTH BEND CENTRAL FOUNDATION$5,000
WAHOO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
GORDONRUSHVILLE SCHOOLS$5,000
MID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF OAKLAND FOUNDATION$5,000
ALLIANCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$5,000
HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,500
LYONS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SUTTON ED FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%WAHOO SCHOOLS: $9k → 7%SHELBY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $2k → 8%WAKEFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SUTTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SYRACUSE FOUNDATION DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $9k → 10%NORTH BEND CENTRAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%PERKINS COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%STAPLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $2k → 11%ADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $12k → 11%BLUE HILLS COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 11%ALLIANCE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $14k → 12%WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%OAKLANDCRAIG PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%MCCOOK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%GORDON RUSHVILLE SCHOOLS: $7k → 12%ELGIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%KEARNEY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 13%SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%LYONS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%WAHOO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%PONCA ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB: $3k → 10%SYRACUSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%NORTH BEND CENTRAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%PERKINS COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%BLUE HILLS COMM PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $4k → 11%ALLIANCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%DONIPHAN TRUMBULL FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%FRIENDS OF OAKLAND FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%MCCOOK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%GORDONRUSHVILLE SCHOOLS: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN: $2k → 13%KEARNEY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%CEDAR BLUFFS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%ADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%DONIPHAN TRUMBULL FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%OAKLANDCRAIG TEAMMATES: $3k → 12%CODYKILGORE UNIFIED SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $119k → 13%ELM CREEK SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%CEDAR BLUFFS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%HASTINGS CHORUS OF THE PLAINS: $3k → 11%LYONS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%OVERTON UPWARD SCHOLARSHIPS: $3k → 13%HASTINGS CHORUS OF THE PLAINS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MA
NV
IA
CO
NE
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 46 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +195% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
16

Total granted

$1.7M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+195%
+25%

Still filing today

22%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $745k · revenue +70%
  • HP
    HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $82k · revenue +195%
  • AC
    ADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +661%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue -20%
  • GP
    GORDON-RUSHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • ME
    MEAD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy
2
Sioux City Public School Foundation

This foundation develops resources that enhance the quality of educaion for students following the mission of the sioux city community school disrict

Education
3
Hastings Community Foundation Inc

The hastings community foundation works to perpetuate and enrich the quality of life in hastings and the surrounding area through the prudent investment and management of philanthropic donations.

Philanthropy
4
Northampton County Area Community College Foundation

The Northampton Community College Foundation, raises, invests and manages private resources for Northampton Community College, it's students, and it's staff.

Education
5
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
6
Stand for Schools

Stand for schools supports nebraska's public schools, working to advance policies that make them stronger while opposing policies that would weaken them.

Education
7
Kellogg Community College Foundation

The kellogg community college foundation generates and encourages philanthropic giving and manages funds exclusively for kcc to enhance the quality of education while building stronger communities.

Education
8
Valley City State University Foundation

Valley City State University Foundation aids in the advancement of Valley City State University by awarding scholarships and by promoting the University. Support comes primarily from contributions by individuals and businesses, fundraising…

—
9
Cleveland Community College Foundation

A conduit for public contributions and other fund-raising activities which benefit programs at Cleveland Community College

Education
10
Cedar Falls Schools Foundation

Supporting, enhancing and expanding opporutnites throughout cedar falls community schools.

Education
11
Kankakee Community College Foundation

Scholarships and financial assistance to promote educational opportunities at kankakee community college

Education
12
Agc of North Dakota Foundaton

To receive and administer funds for educational purposes.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Syracuse Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $81,500 · OtherHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $59,500 · OtherADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONALLIANCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $52,000 · OtherALLIANCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONSYRACUSE FOUNDATION DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $50,000 · OtherGORDON RUSHVILLE SCHOOLS: $46,500 · OtherNORTH BEND CENTRAL FOUNDATION: $42,500 · OtherMEAD EDUCATIONAL FUND DFS: $34,500 · OtherCEDAR BLUFFS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $34,000 · Other+48 more: $548,597 · Other+48 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $744,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION+3 more: $29,000 · EducationKEARNEY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,000 · PhilanthropyLYONS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,250 · PhilanthropyMID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,250 · PhilanthropySIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,750 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,250 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $16,698 · HealthTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $10,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$949,097Education$773,500Philanthropy$78,500Health$16,698Arts & Culture$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $744,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $81,500 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $59,500 over 8y, 18% of budgetALLIANCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $52,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetFRIENDS OF OAKLAND FOUNDATION INC: $26,337 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetKEARNEY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLYONS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,250 over 5y, 17% of budgetSYRACUSE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetWAHOO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $16,698 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $12,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEAD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADAMS CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF OAKLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KEARNEY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LYONS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WAHOO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPITAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nebraska Community Fo…Land O'Lakes Foundati…First Interstate Banc…Kitty M Perkins Found…The Graff Charitable …LeRoy Thom Jean Thom …Hirschfeld Family Fou…Robert B Daugherty Fo…The Sherwood Foundati…Renaissance Charitabl…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…
Nebraska Community FoundationNE17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nebraska Community Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Kitty M Perkins Foundation · The Graff Charitable Foundation Inc Co P Mark Graff · LeRoy Thom Jean Thom and T-L Foundation · Hirschfeld Family Foundation Inc · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kinman-Oldfield Fam Fdn Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kinman-Oldfield Fam Fdn Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kinman-Oldfield Fam Fdn Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home