Skip to content

· Public charity

Kings Ransom Foundation

KRF dedicated to serving people in need, especially families and children worldwide.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$159kHuman Services$150kCrime & Legal$105kHousing & Shelter$63kReligion$53k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $71,635, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,462,128 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,390,493 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $59k
$21,600
Median grant
2
States reached
$635k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teen Rescue Inc$37,485
Habitat for Safe Seniors$21,600
Annies Helping Hands Foundation$7,500
Hill Country Arts Foundation$5,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $236k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Children's Village Foundation: $39k → 10%Habitat for Safe Seniors: $38k → 7%Children's Village Foundation: $36k → 10%Habitat for Safe Seniors: $23k → 7%Children's Village Foundation: $36k → 10%Habitat for Safe Seniors: $22k → 7%Habitat for Safe Seniors: $22k → 7%Habitat for Safe Seniors: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $2.3M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, $2.0M to organizations and $260k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$634k · 28% · 2 grants · 50600 people

Stated purpose: Housing, food & supplies for orphans and vulnerable families · Supplies for clean water initiative · Funds are provided to an individual for the express purpose of supporting an agricultural and feeding program. The funds purchase, food, tools, seeds and are distributed across the region.

Central America and the Caribbean$502k · 22% · 3 grants · 50 people

Stated purpose: Athletic and educational Programs · Housing and education Initiatives · Feeding program for vulnerable families and orphans

South Asia$494k · 22% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Care for women & children rescued from sexual exploitation and trafficking · Food, housing, education and care for orphans · Water Wells, feeding, care & Protection for poor and vulnerable families and children.

Middle East and North Africa$360k · 16% · 1 grant · 14 people

Stated purpose: Food & Provisions for vulnerable families · Funds are provided to an individual for the express purpose of supporting a family with their basic living expenses and needs. · Funds are provided to an individual for the express purpose of supporting a single mother and her children in daily living expenses.

East Asia and the Pacific$285k · 13% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Care for women & children rescued from sexual exploitation and trafficking

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 8 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$530k
$21k

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCrime & LegalReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CANOPY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $111k · revenue +14%
  • TL
    THE LOVE KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $37k · revenue +38%
  • DC
    DIETERT CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $19k · revenue +429%

Funded once

  • CP
    Cornerstone Presbyterian Church
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Palo Verde Valley Senior Citizens Non Profit Corporation

The mission of this organization is to provide a hot lunch meal for senior citizens homeless or families with low income in the community of blythe and the surrounding areas of the palo verde valley

—
2
Family Kitchen

To provide nutritious meals to anyone in need in a safe and caring environment.

Food & Nutrition
3
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
4
Faith Kitchen

Our mission is to provide three hot, nutritious meals 365 days a year to anyone wo walks through our doors. We serve the homeless at the Courtyard at Haven for Hope. The homeless are guests in the kitchen where we provide community and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food From the Heart Inc

Meal delivery: our purpose is to cook nutritious, well-balanced meals and provide this food free of charge to individuals facing a health crisis in their lives.

Human Services
6
Hilltop Regional Kitchen

Serve fresh and frozen meals to seniors, disabled and homebound individuals in central MN. Over 60,000 meals served annually to over 400 individuals.

Food & Nutrition
7
Congregational Kitchen

The congregational kitchen is committed to demonstrating the love of god through the cheerful serving of free delicious meals in a clean, safe comfortable environment to all who are hungry.

Food & Nutrition
8
Caldwell County Nutrition Center

The caldwell nutrition center mission statement is to provide services to improve the qualitiy of life of older adults through nutrition services, social interaction and health services.

Food & Nutrition
9
Farm2People

Farm2People's mission is to secure local harvests and fight hunger in Greater Los Angeles.

Food & Nutrition
10
La Comida De California

To provide nutritious meals to persons 60 years of age and older and their spouses. no fees are charged for these meals, but donations are encouraged.

—
11
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
12
Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills

To prevent animal abuse and neglect, enforce the anti-cruelty laws of the State of California and promote the wellbeing of animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Love Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Teen Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR SAFE SENIORS: $124,950 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR SAFE SENIORSCANOPY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC: $111,000 · Human ServicesCANOPY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INCIMPACT MINISTRIES OF KERRVILLE INC: $38,800 · OtherIMPACT MINISTRIES OF K…Truth Network: $32,000 · OtherTruth NetworkDIETERT CENTER: $18,500 · OtherDIETERT CENTERCornerstone Presbyterian Church: $11,000 · OtherCornerstone Presbyteri…CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM: $10,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AGUDAS AC…Annies Helping Hands Foundation: $7,500 · OtherAnnies Helping Hands F…TOGETHER FREEDOM INC: $105,000 · Crime & LegalTOGETHER FREEDOM IN…BLIND FAITH FOUNDATION: $63,035 · PhilanthropyBLIND FAITH…TEEN RESCUE INC: $37,485 · ReligionTHE LOVE KITCHEN INC: $37,000 · Food & NutritionHILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION: $5,050 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$235,950Other$117,800Crime & Legal$105,000Philanthropy$63,035Religion$37,485Food & Nutrition$37,000Arts & Culture$5,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR SAFE SENIORS: $124,950 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetCANOPY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC: $111,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetTOGETHER FREEDOM INC: $105,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetBLIND FAITH FOUNDATION: $63,035 over 2y, 71% of budgetDIETERT CENTER: $18,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HABITAT FOR SAFE SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds BLIND FAITH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEEN RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVE KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DIETERT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY ARTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kings Ransom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kings Ransom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kings Ransom Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kings Ransom Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kings Ransom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph