Skip to content
Kingdom Treasure Ministries Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Kingdom Treasure Ministries Inc

Promote the gospel of jesus christ

$152k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$88kFood & Nutrition$74kEducation$68kCrime & Legal$37kReligion$36kPublic Benefit$27k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $86,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $152,284 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $65,884 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
$12,900
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STILLWATERS CHRISTIAN BOYS HOME$20,000
FENTON CENTER OF HOPE$15,000
RAHAB RETREAT RANCH$15,000
SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS$12,900
PASS THE SALT$9,000
SOUTHERN LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER$9,000
ELIJAH MINISTRIES$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $149k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%RAHABS RETREAT RANCH: $20k → 16%FENTON CENTER OF HOPE: $35k → 5%RAHABS RETREAT RANCH: $20k → 16%FENTON CENTER OF HOPE: $15k → 5%RAHABS RETREAT RANCH: $20k → 16%FENTON CENTER OF HOPE: $15k → 5%RAHAB RETREAT RANCH: $15k → 16%FENTON CENTER OF HOPE: $9k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MI
OH
MO
KS
TN
NC
SC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 8 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$304k
$20k

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionCrime & LegalPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FENTON CENTER OF HOPE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $74k · revenue +358%
  • SO
    SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +68%
  • SW
    STILL WATERS CHRISTIAN BOARDING SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • OE
    OLD EDGEFIELD DISTRICT GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • LC
    LORDS COVENANT CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shepherds Care Ministries

Pastoral and ministry care and rest

Religion
2
Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Co
Philanthropy
3
Bible Related Ministries

To minister Gods Word to churches and individuals.

Religion
4
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
5
Elijah Harbor Nathan Crockett

Elijahs harbor is a retreat center serv

Religion
6
Freedom Outpost Ministries

Religious Training

Religion
7
Salvation Center

Christian drug and alcohol recovery program

Health
8
Outlaw Ministries

Religious teaching and training.

Religion
9
Pastor Scholar Research Inc

Scholarly research for pastors

Religion
10
Saved Sinner Ministries Inc Brotherhood Biker Church

Christian Church

Religion
11
Truth Renewed Ministries

Biblical counseling and Christian educat

Religion
12
Abbas House
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sons of Confederate Veterans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Still Waters Christian Boarding School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAHABS RETREAT AND RANCH INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesRAHABS RETREAT AND RANCH INCFENTON CENTER OF HOPE: $74,000 · Human ServicesFENTON CENTER OF HOPEANCHOR ACADEMY: $30,000 · OtherANCHOR ACADEMYOLD EDGEFIELD DISTRICT GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY: $13,000 · OtherOLD EDGEFIELD DISTRIC…APOSTOLIC FAITH BIBLE COLLEGE: $12,000 · OtherAPOSTOLIC FAITH BIBLE…LORDS COVENANT CHURCH: $7,000 · OtherLORDS COVENANT CHURCHSOUTHERN LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $37,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN LEG…Pass the Salt Ministries: $23,000 · ReligionPass the …ELIJAH MINISTRIES INC: $5,500 · ReligionELIJAH MI…SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS INC: $27,375 · Public BenefitSONS OF C…STILL WATERS CHRISTIAN BOARDING SCHOOL: $26,000 · Education
Human Services$149,000Other$62,000Crime & Legal$37,000Religion$28,500Public Benefit$27,375Education$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAHABS RETREAT AND RANCH INC: $75,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetFENTON CENTER OF HOPE: $74,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetSOUTHERN LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $37,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS INC: $27,375 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSTILL WATERS CHRISTIAN BOARDING SCHOOL: $26,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetPass the Salt Ministries: $23,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetAPOSTOLIC FAITH BIBLE COLLEGE: $12,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetELIJAH MINISTRIES INC: $5,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kingdom Treasure Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kingdom Treasure Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kingdom Treasure Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home