Skip to content

· Public charity

Kinexus Youth Solutions

To equip young people with the skills to overcome barriers and success in education, employment, and in life.

$3.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$448k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Employment$12MYouth Development$9.1MEducation$254k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.7M
$93,141
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GST MICHIGAN WORKS$447,656
NETWORKS NORTHWEST$434,883
DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION$416,000
SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$355,317
MICHIGAN WORKS REGION 7B$229,627
WE UPJOHN INSTITUTE$182,542
MICHIGAN WORKS SOUTHEAST$178,506
UPWARD TALENT COUNCIL$166,162
WEST MICHIGAN WORKS$114,718
CAPITAL AREA MICHIGAN WORKS$111,247
MICHIGAN WORKS NORTHEAST CONSORTIUM$103,400
MARQUETTE-ALGER RESA$94,796
MICHIGAN WORKS WEST CENTRAL$93,141
COUNTY OF OAKLAND A MICHIGAN CONSTITUTIONAL CORP$80,587
BRIDGE ACADEMY OF SOUTHWEST MI$79,210
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY: $402k → 21%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY: $384k → 21%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY: $372k → 21%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $362k → 21%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $355k → 21%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $354k → 21%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $329k → 21%SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY: $312k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 21 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$21M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+225%

Still filing today

38%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DE
    DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +23%
  • SM
    SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +57%
  • NM
    NORTHWEST MICHIGAN WORKS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • KR
    KALAMAZOO REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue +225%
  • CI
    CALHOUN INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • WS
    WEST SHORE EDUCATIONAL SERVICE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
2
Northwest Wisconsin Workforce Investment Board Inc

The northwest wisconsin workforce investment board (nwwib) will create, and continue to improve, an innovative and quality strategic direction for the regional workforce development system.

Public Benefit
3
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
4
Michigan State Afl-Cio Workforce Development Institute

To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.

Employment
5
Southwest Washington Workforce Development Council

Swwdc's mission is to prepare and promote a skilled and adaptive workforce for a thriving economy in southwest washington. swwdc and its community partners provide job search assistance, education and training to individuals and assist…

Philanthropy
6
Northeast Indiana Works Inc

The corporation was formed to receive and administer funds for educational, charitable, job training, and workforce development purposes in northeast indiana.

Employment
7
Fox Valley Workforce Development Board Inc

Working collaboratively in our communities to create and sustain a fully engaged, talented workforce for tomorrow, and beyond.

Employment
8
Kinexus Youth Solutions

To equip young people with the skills to overcome barriers and success in education, employment, and in life.

Employment
9
Massachusetts Regional Employment Board Association

The massachusetts workforce association (mwa) is a statewide membership association that leads, advocates and convenes on behalf of the massachusetts workforce development system.

Employment
10
The Center of Workforce Innovations Inc

To be a catalyst for community and business investment in building and aligning workforce, education, and economic development strategies while accelerating economic growth for regions and states.

Community Improvement
11
Institute for Workforce Excellence Inc

The institute for workforce excellence is dedicated to helping indiana attract, develop and retain hoosier talent needed to drive a highly skilled and equitable workforce.

Employment
12
Southwest Minnesota Private Industry Council Inc

Building tomorrow's workforce through training, leadership, and economic development.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berrien-Cass-Vanburen Workforce Development Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kalamazoo Regional Educational Service Agency Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GST MICHIGAN WORKS: $2,521,608 · OtherGST MICHIGAN WORKSMICHIGAN WORKS JOB FORCE BOARD: $1,307,147 · OtherMICHIGAN WORKS JOB FORCE BOARDCAPITAL AREA MICHIGAN WORKS FOUNDATION: $993,402 · OtherCAPITAL AREA MICHIGAN WORKS FOUNDATIONMICHIGAN WORKS REGION 7B: $862,678 · OtherMICHIGAN WORKS REGION 7BMICHIGAN WORKS SOUTHEAST WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD: $839,501 · OtherMICHIGAN WORKS SOUTHEAST WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARDMICHIGAN WORKS NORTHEAST: $705,587 · OtherMICHIGAN WORKS NORTHEASTBERRIEN-CASS-VANBUREN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $695,242 · OtherBERRIEN-CASS-VANBUREN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN…ACSET: $655,808 · OtherACSETMARQUETTE-ALGER REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY: $354,035 · OtherKENT INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $351,718 · Other+12 more: $534,385 · Other+12 moreDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION: $3,775,829 · EmploymentDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATIONNORTHWEST MICHIGAN WORKS INC: $2,744,671 · EmploymentNORTHWEST MICHIGAN WORKS INCW E UPJOHN UNEMPLOYMENT TRUSTEE CORPORATION: $1,568,285 · EmploymentW E UPJOHN UNEMPLOYMENT TRUSTEE CORPORATION+1 more: $22,172 · EmploymentSOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $2,871,464 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST MICHI…The Institute for Excellence in Education: $254,290 · EducationKALAMAZOO REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $171,116 · Youth Development
Other$9,821,111Employment$8,110,957Human Services$2,871,464Education$284,290Youth Development$171,116

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION: $3,775,829 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $2,871,464 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetNORTHWEST MICHIGAN WORKS INC: $2,744,671 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetW E UPJOHN UNEMPLOYMENT TRUSTEE CORPORATION: $1,568,285 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBERRIEN-CASS-VANBUREN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $695,242 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetThe Institute for Excellence in Education: $254,290 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $171,116 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetKALAMAZOO REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPECKHAM VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC DBA PECKHAM INC: $22,172 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST MICHIGAN WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds W E UPJOHN UNEMPLOYMENT TRUSTEE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BERRIEN-CASS-VANBUREN WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds The Institute for Excellence in Education ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AGENCY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PECKHAM VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC DBA PECKHAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan College Access NetworkMI19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan College Access Network · Michigan Elementary and Middle School Principals Association Inc · Michigan Physical Fitness Health and Sports Foundation · United Way of the Lakeshore

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kinexus Youth Solutions funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kinexus Youth Solutions. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kinexus Youth Solutions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph