Skip to content
Kids Campaign Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kids Campaign Inc

To promote, foster, encourage, support and sponsor various activities for the general educational, vocational, recreational, civic and social improvement and betterment of economically deprived boys and girls throughout the united states

$189k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Employment$118kHuman Services$100kEducation$80kYouth Development$72kRecreation & Sports$44kHealth$38kReligion$18kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $132,498, the rows itemized in this filing. The $188,933 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $56,435 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $126k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$254k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY$35,498
BALTIMORE EDU SCHOLARSHIP TR$20,000
ROBERTAS HOUSE$15,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALT$12,500
INNER CITY SUBURBAN YOUTH FDN$12,500
CAMP PUHTOK$10,500
HELPING UP MISSON$10,500
CARTER SCHOOL OF MUSIC$10,000
WOODBERRY CROSSINGS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROBERTAS HOUSE: $15k → 19%ROBERTAS HOUSE: $15k → 19%ROBERTAS HOUSE: $15k → 19%THE Y IN CENTRAL MARYLAND: $8k → 11%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALT: $13k → 19%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALT: $13k → 19%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALT: $13k → 19%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALT: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 9 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$461k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+31%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BE
    BALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST
    4× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +3%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +5%
  • RH
    ROBERTA'S HOUSE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY: $117,702 · OtherBURLINGTON COAT FACTORYINNER CITY SUBURBAN YOUTH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherINNER CITY SUBURBAN YOUTH FOUNDATIONHELPING UP MISSION INC: $38,160 · OtherHELPING UP MISSION INCMORNING STAR CHURCH OF CHRIST: $17,500 · OtherMORNING STAR CHURCH OF CHRISTCARTER SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $10,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL OF B…ROBERTA'S HOUSE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesROBERTA'S HOUSE INCYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian A…BALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $80,000 · EducationBALTIMORE EDUCATIO…Woodberry Crossing Inc: $44,000 · Recreation & SportsWoodberry …CAMP PUHTOK FOR BOYS AND GIRLS INC: $31,500 · Youth Development
Other$223,362Human Services$100,000Education$80,000Recreation & Sports$44,000Youth Development$31,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $80,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC: $47,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetROBERTA'S HOUSE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWoodberry Crossing Inc: $44,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $38,160 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP PUHTOK FOR BOYS AND GIRLS INC: $31,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERTA'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Woodberry Crossing Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP PUHTOK FOR BOYS AND GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community F…Amazonsmile Foundation
Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kids Campaign Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kids Campaign Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Roberta's House Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kids Campaign Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kids Campaign Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kids Campaign’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home