Skip to content

· Private foundation

Khoury Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$396k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$881kFood & Nutrition$172kReligion$75kHousing & Shelter$59kPublic Benefit$55kInternational$50kHealth$21kHuman Services$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
  • $250k+1 grant · $333k
$5,700
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANCE ALIVE$333,000
FRIENDS OF JORDAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY$24,000
JORDAN ELBRIDGE BAND BOOSTERS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,950
DONALD MOORE (LANDLORD FOR RONALD RANSIER)$5,700
CNY VETERANS RECOGNITION FOUNDATION$5,000
DELTA KAPPA GAMMA INTERGENERATIONAL ALPHA IOTA CHAPTER$5,000
JOSE MURILLO MUNOZ AND FAMILY$4,000
VILLAGE OF JORDAN GARDEN RESTORATION$2,000
SAMBRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN FRIEND OF THE ESPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CT
MO
NM
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 57% of Khoury Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 8%.

Khoury Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
23

Total granted

$1.1M
$253k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+21%

Still filing today

20%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    Dance Alive Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $687k · revenue +329%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $140k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF JORDAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $59k

Funded once

  • CN
    CENTRAL NY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CM
    CADE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • PG
    PORT GIBSON UMC & UMC BUILDING FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
2
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
3
Care Dimensions Inc

Care dimensions, inc. (cd) enriches quality of life by providing expert care, support, education, and consultation for those affected by life limiting illness, death, and loss.

—
4
The Connecticut Hospice Inc

In 1974 the connecticut hospice inc., a 501(c)(3) not for profit, founded america's hospice movement, almost 50 years later, we continue to set the national standard for home and inpatient hospice care and have become a leader in…

Human Services
5
Hospice of Holland Inc

The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.

Human Services
6
Hebrew Seniorlife Hospice Care Inc

The mission of hsl hospice is to provide exceptional care to terminally ill patients and their families allowing patients to attain the highest quality of life possible. hsl hospice aims to provide the highest quality hospice service that…

Human Services
7
Hospice Care Network

Our mission is to enable persons to live with peace and dignity in a caring environment during the final stages of life by offering care and comfort to both them and to those whom they share their lives.

Human Services
8
Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center Inc

The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…

Health
9
Jewish Home At Home Inc

Providing charitable services to the elderly or infirm to assist them to continue to reside in their home environment.

Human Services
10
The Inn Between

The inn between is utah's only end of life and medical respite housing soultion for terminally ill and medically compromised adults experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
11
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
12
Hospice East Inc

The mission of hospice east, inc. is to enhance the quality of life for incurably ill persons and their families in clark and powell counties, kentucky by providing physical, social, psychological and spiritual care.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Caring Coalition of Central New York; the most unlike its peers is Florida Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dance Alive Inc: $687,000 · OtherDance Alive IncIndividual grant recipient: $140,025 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF JORDAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $59,275 · OtherPORT GIBSON UMC (BUILDING FUND): $50,000 · OtherHEART OF HIGH SPRINGS (WALL DOG PROJECT): $50,000 · OtherCENTRAL NY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherCADE MUSEUM (CATALYST CAMPAIGN): $50,000 · Other+28 more: $243,970 · Other+28 moreTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionOPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $15,000 · HealthThe Falcons Nest Inc: $2,000 · HealthJORDAN ELBRIDGE BAND BOOSTERS INC: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterFLORIDA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · AnimalsMISSION FISHIN' CORPORATION: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,330,270Food & Nutrition$25,000Health$17,000Education$10,000Human Services$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Animals$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDance Alive Inc: $687,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetTHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJORDAN ELBRIDGE BAND BOOSTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE CARING COALITION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAFTER THE HARVEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Falcons Nest Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dance Alive Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds JORDAN ELBRIDGE BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARING COALITION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AFTER THE HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Falcons Nest Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FISHIN' CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Khoury Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Khoury Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Khoury Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Khoury Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Khoury Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph