Skip to content
Khalil Mack Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Khalil Mack Foundation Inc

$45k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Youth Development$142kRecreation & Sports$82kEmployment$80kHealth$50kCommunity Improvement$50kReligion$22kHuman Services$17kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
$5,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$27
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREASURE COAST ELITE INC$26,680
Individual grant recipient$6,529
Individual grant recipient$5,400
CAMP ABOUT FACE$5,000
FIRE HAWKS FOOTBALL TEAM$1,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%A BETTER CHICAGO: $100k → 14%MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gem Culture Inc

Charitale youth organization

Human Services
2
Camp Thrive

Children learning

Religion
3
Confidence Rules

Prevent and avoid abuse in youth

—
4
Black Girls Rock Inc

To inspire inner city children

Human Services
5
Save Our Youth
—
6
ALL4LOVE

Helping disadvantage youth with academics and social motivation

Youth Development
7
Save the Youth Inc

To deter youth and adults from violence, illiteracy and drugs

Youth Development
8
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
9
Rockteen Youth Foundation

The nbsp;rockteen nbsp;youth nbsp;foundation nbsp;is nbsp;a nbsp;youth nbsp;mentoring nbsp;program nbsp;that nbsp;promotes nbsp;academic nbsp;achievement nbsp;character nbsp;development nbsp; amp; nbsp;positive nbsp;life nbsp;choices…

Youth Development
10
Safeguard Attone Validate Educate

Making kids job ready instead jail ready

Youth Development
11
Saba K7 Inc

Youth education

Arts & Culture
12
Tough Kids Boot Camp Inc
Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save Our Children; the most unlike its peers is Multi Cultural Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WALMART: $80,000 · OtherWALMARTGREATER HORIZONS: $50,000 · OtherGREATER HORIZONSWESTWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $26,400 · OtherWESTWOOD HIGH SCHOOLCAMP ABOUT FACE INC: $20,000 · OtherCAMP ABOUT FACE INCROUNDTABLE OF SAINT LUCIE COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherROUNDTABLE OF SAINT LUCIE COUNTYMIRACLE PRAYER TEMPLE INC: $12,000 · OtherDIAMOND DYNAMICS FIERCE 124: $10,000 · OtherVICTORIOUS 1 HEART AND SOUL: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $31,629 · Other+7 moreA Better Chicago: $100,000 · Human ServicesA Better ChicagoMULTI CULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $12,000 · Human ServicesMULTI CULTURAL RESOURCE CE…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…TREASURE COAST ELITE: $44,270 · Recreation & SportsTREASURE CO…Camp About Face Inc: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCamp About …END IT CORPORATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF STLUCIE COUNTY INC: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT ROCK SOUTH INC: $3,000 · EducationFUTURE GENERATIONS OF ST LUCIE COUNTY: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$255,029Human Services$112,000Health$50,000Recreation & Sports$49,270Youth Development$9,000Education$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA Better Chicago: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREASURE COAST ELITE: $44,270 over 2y, 25% of budgetMULTI CULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER: $12,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSAVE OUR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCamp About Face Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF STLUCIE COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWORD OUTREACH MENTORING & RESOURCE CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFUTURE GENERATIONS OF ST LUCIE COUNTY: $3,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Khalil Mack Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Khalil Mack Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Khalil Mack Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Khalil Mack Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Khalil Mack’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home