Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kerrigan Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

International$173kHuman Services$103kYouth Development$80kReligion$78kFood & Nutrition$45kHealth$40kCivil Rights$38kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $140k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAITI CHILDREN$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG BEND$15,000
TOSTAN$10,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000
SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND$10,000
CAMFRED$10,000
THE HUNGER PROJECT$10,000
FAITH MINISTRY$10,000
MANNA$10,000
GIVE DIRECTLY$10,000
MERCY SHIPS$10,000
FISTULA FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED MINISTRIES$10,000
STAC$5,000
LITTLE SUNSHINE PANTRIES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%CAMFRED: $18k → 10%THE HUNGER PROJECT: $15k → 17%MERCY SHIPS: $10k → 12%TOSTAN: $18k → 14%PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS ESCAMBIA: $10k → 16%SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND: $18k → 19%HAITI CHILDREN: $20k → 6%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $20k → 6%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%CAMFRED: $10k → 10%THE HUNGER PROJECT: $10k → 17%MERCY SHIPS: $10k → 12%TOSTAN: $10k → 14%PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS ESCAMBIA: $5k → 16%SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND: $10k → 19%HAITI CHILDREN: $15k → 6%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $10k → 6%FISTULA FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%CAMFRED: $10k → 10%THE HUNGER PROJECT: $8k → 17%TOSTAN: $10k → 14%PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS ESCAMBIA: $5k → 16%SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND: $10k → 19%HAITI CHILDREN: $15k → 6%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $10k → 6%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $20k → 17%STAC: $5k → 19%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $10k → 17%LITTLE SUNSHINE PANTRIES: $5k → 19%STAC: $3k → 19%PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS LEON: $20k → 19%LITTLE SUNSHINE PANTRIES: $3k → 19%THE KEARNEY CENTER: $10k → 19%THE KEARNEY CENTER: $5k → 19%THE KEARNEY CENTER: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Kerrigan Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Kerrigan Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$580k · 20 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
1

Total granted

$580k
$20k

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Fistula Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +47%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG BEND INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +70%
  • AS
    AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $38k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • PC
    PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS LEON
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
4
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
5
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
6
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
7
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
8
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
9
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
10
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
11
Globus Relief

The mission of globus relief is to improve the delivery of healthcare worldwide by gathering, processing and distributing surplus medical and health supplies to charities at home and abroad.

International
12
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAITI CHILDREN — $50,000 · OtherHAITI CHILDRENFAITH MINISTRY — $40,000 · OtherFAITH MINISTRYUNITED MINISTRIES INC — $40,000 · OtherUNITED MINISTRIES INCMANNA — $37,500 · OtherMANNACAMFRED — $37,500 · OtherCAMFREDPACE CENTER FOR GIRLS ESCAMBIA — $20,000 · OtherPACE CENTER FOR GIRLS ESCAMBIATHE KEARNEY CENTER — $20,000 · OtherTHE KEARNEY CENTERBREHON FAMILY SERVICES — $20,000 · OtherBREHON FAMILY SERVICESPACE CENTER FOR GIRLS LEON — $20,000 · OtherPACE CENTER FOR GIRLS LEON+2 more — $15,000 · OtherTOSTAN INC — $37,500 · InternationalTOSTAN INCTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $32,500 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJ…International Rescue Committee INC — $30,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue C…Mercy Ships International — $20,000 · InternationalMercy Ships Internatio…The Fistula Foundation — $40,000 · HealthThe Fistula Fou…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $40,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEA…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG BEND INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND INC — $37,500 · Food & NutritionGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesREFUGE HOUSE INC — $7,500 · Human Services
Other$300,000International$120,000Health$80,000Youth Development$40,000Food & Nutrition$37,500Human Services$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG BEND INC — $40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES INC — $40,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTOSTAN INC — $37,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND INC — $37,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT — $32,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGE HOUSE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG BEND INC
  • Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds TOSTAN INC
  • Who funds AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF THE BIG BEND INC
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC
  • Who funds REFUGE HOUSE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kerrigan Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Refuge House Inc10% of income from government
  • America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc6% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph