Skip to content

· Private foundation

Keren Eliyahu Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$849k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$849k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.1MReligion$941kEducation$438kArts & Culture$57kHuman Services$36kRecreation & Sports$22kInternational$11kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$849,330
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITIES - SEE A$849,330
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ACHIEZER: $6k → 17%ACHIEZER: $5k → 17%KEREN ANIYIM: $1k → 17%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$886k · 50 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
248

Total granted

$886k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+37%

Still filing today

10%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $849k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionInternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +32%
  • AC
    ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $11k · revenue +58%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +373%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $355k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $206k · revenue +90%
  • M
    Mir
    one grant, 2022 · $72k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
6
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
7
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
8
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
9
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
10
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
11
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
12
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kitov Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 300 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS CHARITIES - SEE A: $849,330 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIES - SEE AIndividual grant recipient: $355,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $209,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $108,944 · Other+186 more: $1,074,842 · Other+186 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $206,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $11,100 · Human ServicesKEREN ANIYIM INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHAYIM ARUCHIM INC: $500 · Human ServicesKEREN YEHOSHUA V'YISROEL: $10,000 · EducationYESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE INC: $1,250 · EducationFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,800 · Arts & CultureBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $3,800 · Health
Other$2,597,116International$206,000Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$12,600Education$11,250Arts & Culture$6,800Health$3,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $206,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $11,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKEREN YEHOSHUA V'YISROEL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADRAIGOS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAYIM ARUCHIM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YEHOSHUA V'YISROEL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY38× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ganger Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Basch Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Stern Family Foundation · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Joseph and Martha Melohn Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Keren Eliyahu Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Keren Eliyahu Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Keren Eliyahu Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Keren Eliyahu Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 300 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Keren Eliyahu’s filings →

    More from the funding graph