Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kent Presents Inc

The organizations mission is to provide direct educational and cultural opportunities of local and national significance through an annual conference of educational, intellectual, and cultural topics in the kent, ct and surrounding towns in litchfield county.

$126k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Housing & Shelter$40kEducation$34kFood & Nutrition$23kHuman Services$12kHealth$12kEmployment$12kPhilanthropy$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$6k
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $69,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $126,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $57,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENT MEMORIAL LIBRARY$9,000
LOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE$8,500
KENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC$8,000
KENT EDUCATION CENTER & NURSERY SCH$7,500
THE GATHERING PLACE OF TORRINGTON$6,500
GREENWOODS COUNSELING REFERRALS INC$6,000
COMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NE CT$6,000
KENT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC$6,000
CHILDRENS CENTER OF NEW MILFORD$6,000
KENT VILLAGE HOUSING FOR ELDERLY$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$124k · 9 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$124k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+245%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Housing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KL
    KENT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $19k · revenue +457%
  • KA
    KENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +305%
  • KC
    KENT COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • KC
    KENT COMMUNITY FUND INCgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +46%
  • TC
    THE CORNER FOOD PANTRY INCgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +245%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kent Community Foundation

To strengthen and support our community through partnerships and philanthropy.

Philanthropy
2
Kent Free Library Foundation Inc

The foundation serves as a vehicle to receive essentially unsolicited donations which are used to benefit the kent free library and its programs.

3
Kent Attainable Housing Inc

To break the cycle of poverty by building or renovating affordable houses and partnering with low income, working families to prepare for and buy a home.

Housing & Shelter
4
Kent County Community Action Agency

Provide daycare, after school care & nutritional feeding program to children ages 1 to 12 in families with significantly low household income

Human Services
5
Emergency Food Aid in Southbury

Providing food assistance to Southbury residents demonstrating need.

6
Norwalk Congregate Homes for the Elderly Inc

The corporation owns and operates a 49 unit hud subsidized low income elderly housing

Housing & Shelter
7
Kent Economic Partnership Inc

The kent economic partnership (kep) is a non-profit organization created to support and expand business interests throughout central delaware.

Community Improvement
8
Kent-Delord House Museum
9
Kearney Housing Development Corporation

This organization provides services to kearney area individuals in need.

Housing & Shelter
10
Kent Historical Society

Organization that strives to be the primary kent history resource and reference center, leading the community in the collection, preservation and interpretation of kent's heritage through exhibits, educational programs and activities. the…

11
Norwalk Childcare Center Inc

Child care

12
Newtown Housing for the Elderly Inc

Newtown housing for the elderly, inc., ("nhe"), is a non-profit organization established to provide low cost housing for those persons aged sixty-two or older and to those persons who are handicapped or disabled. nhe operates nunnawauk…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kent Community Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Beginnings of Northwest Hills Litchfield County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KENT COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL INC — $15,000 · OtherKENT COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL INCNEW BEGINNINGS OF NORTHWEST HILLS LITCHFIELD COUNTY INC — $13,000 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS OF NORTHWEST HILLS LITCHF…THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF NEW MILFORD INC — $12,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF NEW MILFORD INCCOMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLC — $11,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NW CT LLCKENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $16,000 · Housing & ShelterKENT AFFORDABLE HOUSI…KENT VILLAGE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC — $11,000 · Housing & ShelterKENT VILLAGE HOUSING …KENT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC — $18,500 · EducationKENT LIBRARY A…LOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC — $15,500 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FIS…GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC — $11,500 · HealthGREENWOOD…KENT COMMUNITY FUND INC — $7,500 · PhilanthropyTHE CORNER FOOD PANTRY INC — $7,000 · Food & NutritionKENT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $6,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$51,500Housing & Shelter$27,000Education$18,500Human Services$15,500Health$11,500Philanthropy$7,500Food & Nutrition$7,000Public Safety & Disaster$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKENT LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC — $18,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetKENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC — $16,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES HOSPITALITY HOUSE INC — $15,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetKENT COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL INC — $15,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF NEW MILFORD INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC — $11,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetKENT VILLAGE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY INC — $11,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE CORNER FOOD PANTRY INC — $7,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetKENT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Babbitt Family Charitable TrustNY15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Babbitt Family Charitable Trust · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kent Presents Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Greenwoods Counseling & Referrals Inc7% of income from government
  • The Children's Center of New Milford Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph