Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth Whalen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$3.4MEducation$480kCrime & Legal$321kFood & Nutrition$201kYouth Development$60kHuman Services$50kRecreation & Sports$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $504
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $345k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$90,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$400,000
ALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC$400,000
RADY'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$350,000
Individual grant recipient$175,000
BILATERAL SAFETY CORRIDOR COALITION$90,000
THE MONARCH SCHOOL$80,000
ALBION 12 FOUNDATION$20,000
HUNTSMAN FOUNDATION$14,590
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$400
Individual grant recipient$104
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RADY'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $350k → 11%USC ANNENBERG SCHOOL: $150k → 14%THE MONARCH SCHOOL: $257k → 16%HUNTSMAN FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%CAPTIVATING INTERNATIONAL: $175k → 11%USC ANNENBERG SCHOOL: $150k → 14%THE MONARCH SCHOOL: $200k → 16%RADY'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $310k → 11%USC ANNENBERG SCHOOL: $75k → 14%THE MONARCH SCHOOL: $80k → 16%CAPTIVATING INTERNATIONAL: $175k → 11%USC ANNENBERG SCHOOL: $75k → 14%THE MONARCH SCHOOL: $65k → 16%RADY'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $300k → 11%USC ANNENBERG SCHOOL: $30k → 14%THE MONARCH SCHOOL: $60k → 16%CAPTIVATING INTERNATIONAL: $175k → 11%KKGDELTA TAU: $3k → 14%THE MONARCH SCHOOL: $60k → 16%BURN INSTITUTE: $50k → 11%CAPTIVATING INTERNATIONAL: $175k → 11%BURN INSTITUTE: $40k → 11%CAPTIVATING INTERNATIONAL: $175k → 11%BURN INSTITUTE: $29k → 11%CAPTIVATING INTERNATIONAL: $122k → 11%BILATERAL SAFETY CORRIDOR COALITION: $101k → 11%BILATERAL SAFETY CORRIDOR COALITION: $100k → 11%BILATERAL SAFETY CORRIDOR COALITION: $90k → 11%BILATERAL SAFETY CORRIDOR COALITION: $60k → 11%BILATERAL SAFETY CORRIDOR COALITION: $60k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATON: $600k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATON: $550k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATON: $400k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATON: $400k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATON: $310k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATON: $304k → 11%SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $101k → 11%SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $100k → 11%CUREBOUND: $55k → 11%SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $400 → 11%ALBION 12 FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%ALBION 12 FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%ALBION 12 FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%HARBOR POLICE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIE: $20k → 11%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIE: $20k → 11%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIE: $20k → 11%CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 11 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$8.9M
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+6%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +62% · 50% of their budget
  • TM
    The Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff
    6× · 2020–2025 · $722k · revenue +34%
  • BS
    Bilateral Safety Corridor Coalition
    5× · 2021–2025 · $411k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • C
    CUREBOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue +6%
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • HP
    HARBOR POLICE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
2
Pasadena Bio Collaborative Incubator

Pasadena bio collaborative incubator is a nonprofit organization focused on economic development and job creation in southern california. we encourage the growth of an innovative biotechnology industry by providing educational/training…

Science & Tech
3
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
4
Building Industry Association of San Diego

The mission of the building industry association of san diego is to proactively promote a positive business environment for the land development, home building and commercial development industry throughout san diego county.

—
5
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
6
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
7
Alliance for Southern California Innovation

Our mission is to more fully capitalize on socal's compelling diversity of talent, ideas and perspectives byoptimizing the conditions for socal's innovators to bring more breakthroughs to the world and further elevate the region as a…

Community Improvement
8
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
9
American Institute of Biological Sciences Inc

The American Institute of Biological Sciences AIBS is a national scientific organization promoting the use of science to inform decision-making which advances biology for the benefit of science and society. AIBS initiatives are unified by…

Science & Tech
10
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
11
The Lam Foundation

The LAM Foundation urgently seeks safe and effective treatments and ultimately a cure for LAM.

Philanthropy
12
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is The Huntsman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,563,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $996,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRADY'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $960,000 · OtherRADY'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITALUSC ANNENBERG SCHOOL: $480,000 · OtherUSC ANNENBERG SCHOOL+6 more: $137,394 · OtherALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $2,375,000 · HealthALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $55,000 · HealthThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff: $721,510 · EducationThe Monar…Bilateral Safety Corridor Coalition: $411,000 · Crime & LegalJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $201,400 · Food & NutritionBurn Institute: $118,700 · PhilanthropyALBION 12 FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,137,694Health$2,430,000Education$721,510Crime & Legal$411,000Food & Nutrition$201,400Philanthropy$118,700Recreation & Sports$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $2,375,000 over 6y, 50% of budgetThe Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff: $721,510 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetBilateral Safety Corridor Coalition: $411,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $201,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBurn Institute: $118,700 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetALBION 12 FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCUREBOUND: $55,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPORT SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Monarch School Monarch Institute for Neurological Diff ↗
  • Who funds Bilateral Safety Corridor Coalition ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Burn Institute ↗
  • Who funds ALBION 12 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTSMAN FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth Whalen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth Whalen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kenneth Whalen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kenneth Whalen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenneth Whalen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph