Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Keith G Sebelius Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$4kReligion$3kEnvironment$2kPhilanthropy$2kHealth$975Arts & Culture$800Human Services$750Crime & Legal$525Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$100
Median grant
2
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$500
Valley Hope Association Foundation$250
Norton County Community Foundation$250
Norton Public Library Foundation$100
Norton County Historical Society$100
Individual grant recipient$100
Prairie Dog Press$100
Camp Lakeside$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $150) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Kansas Childrens Service League: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11k · 12 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$11k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+14%

Still filing today

33%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    First United Methodist Church
    3× · 2019–2023 · $3k
  • NP
    NCCF PROPERTY INVESTMENTS INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue -51%
  • FH
    Fort Hays State U Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k

Funded once

  • NK
    NW Ks Inmate Resource Council
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • KC
    KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2019 · $150 · revenue +14%
  • U2
    USD 211
    one grant, 2019 · $150

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Kansas Land Trust Inc

To protect and preserve lands of natural, ecological, scenic, historic, agricultural, or recreational significance in kansas.

Environment
4
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
5
American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Inc

Driven by a vision to end cancer as we know it for everyone, the american cancer society cancer action network, inc. (acs can) advocates for evidence-based public policies to reduce the cancer burden by engaging advocates across the…

Health
6
The Kansas University Alumni Association

We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.

Education
7
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

8
American Chemistry Council

The purpose of the council shall be the promotion of the interests of the business of chemistry in the united states of america, its territories and possessions and globally.

9
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
10
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

12
North Carolina State University College of Sciences Foundation Inc

Provide financial support for all types of education and research within the college of sciences at north carolina state university.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Childrens Service League and the most unlike its peers is Norton County Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

First United Methodist Church — $3,000 · OtherFirst United Methodist ChurchTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFort Hays State U Foundation — $1,500 · OtherFort Hays State U FoundationNORTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $700 · OtherNORTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIONNW Ks Inmate Resource Council — $500 · OtherThe Salvation Army — $500 · Other+14 more — $2,025 · Other+14 moreNCCF PROPERTY INVESTMENTS INC — $1,750 · PhilanthropyNCCF PROPERTY…FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,500 · EducationFORT HAYS S…Valley Hope Association Foundation — $600 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $100 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100 · HealthKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE — $150 · Human ServicesKansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Inc — $25 · Crime & Legal
Other$10,225Philanthropy$1,750Education$1,500Health$800Human Services$150Crime & Legal$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNCCF PROPERTY INVESTMENTS INC — $1,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetValley Hope Association Foundation — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds NCCF PROPERTY INVESTMENTS INC
  • Who funds FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Valley Hope Association Foundation
  • Who funds NORTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Kansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Northwest Kansas Community FoundationKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Northwest Kansas Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Keith G Sebelius Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph