Skip to content

· Public charity

Katzman Family Support Foundation

To support the jewish community and the community as a whole.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$125k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Katzman Family Support Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Metropolitan Detroit, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
2
’18
1
’19
4
’20
3
’21
3
’22
3
’23
2
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$6.1MInternational$1.4MHuman Services$300kHealth$225kReligion$200kRecreation & Sports$200kYouth Development$100kEducation$25k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT$125,000
BRILLIANT DETROIT$50,000
CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $325k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $50k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $50k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $50k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $50k → 11%JARC: $75k → 8%JARC: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 48% of Katzman Family Support Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Katzman Family Support Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 4 repeat orgs$450k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$2.0M
$450k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+67%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue -6%
  • BRILLIANT DETROIT
    4× · 2021–2025 · $350k · revenue -19%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • JH
    JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +68%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
6
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
7
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
8
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
9
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
10
Friends of Ir David Inc

To provide assistance to organizations in the old city of jerusalem and the ancient city of david.

International
11
The Jewish Federation of Nwi Inc

Enriching jewish life in northwest indiana, in israel and around the world through service, programming, advocacy and fundraising.

—
12
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Youth Renewal Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $3,550,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROITDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,591,144 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $998,854 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATIONAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,325,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL ED…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · International+1 more: $25,000 · InternationalBRILLIANT DETROIT: $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesJARC: $125,000 · Human ServicesTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT: $200,000 · OtherJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $150,000 · ReligionYOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $25,000 · Education
Philanthropy$6,139,998International$1,400,000Youth Development$350,000Human Services$325,000Other$200,000Religion$150,000Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $3,550,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,591,144 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,325,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $998,854 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBRILLIANT DETROIT: $350,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $150,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetJARC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH RENEWAL FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grosfeld FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grosfeld Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katzman Family Support Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katzman Family Support Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Katzman Family Support Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Katzman Family Support Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Katzman Family Support’s filings →

    More from the funding graph