Skip to content
Katz Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Katz Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$414kFood & Nutrition$93kHuman Services$82kEducation$45kPhilanthropy$27kInternational$5kPublic Benefit$600Health$536Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$53k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOV$10,000
CONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARON$7,300
FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM$5,000
VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS$1,284
KEREN HATZEDAKA INC$860
BNOS RUCHEL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAVID MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%TZIDKAS AVROHOM: $2k → 28%FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM: $5k → 7%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%TZIDKAS AVROHOM: $2k → 28%KEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $24k → 11%OZER DALIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $24k → 11%OZER DALIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $14k → 11%OZER DALIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5k → 11%BONEI OLAM: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $36 → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $860 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$723k · 38 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
25

Total granted

$723k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+21%

Still filing today

24%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $93k · revenue +180%
  • KH
    KEREN HATZEDAKA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $67k · revenue +104%
  • YO
    YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $34k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +63%
  • CF
    CONGREGATION FOREST GLEN INC
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • UT
    UNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY TORAH VYI
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Gedola Na'os Yaakov

A post-secondary school offering an educational program in talmudic study

Education
7
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
8
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
9
Yeshiva Gedolah Rabbinical College Inc

Provide college level education and extensive background of jewish law and talmudic studies and rabbinical ordination.

Education
10
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
11
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
12
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomchei Tzedaka Corp; the most unlike its peers is The Chasdei Shimon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARON: $140,372 · OtherCONGREGATION MOSDOS TOLDOS AHARONVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS: $129,322 · OtherVARIOUS ORGANIZATIONSJEWISH OUTREACH CONGREGATION: $65,180 · OtherJEWISH OUTREACH CONGREGATIONCONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOV: $32,000 · OtherCONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOVCONGREGATION CHASADIM TOVIM INC: $20,476 · Other+43 more: $119,929 · Other+43 moreTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $93,200 · Food & NutritionTOMCHEI SHABB…KEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $66,863 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZE…FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF …TZIDKAS AVRAHAM INC: $3,960 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $3,500 · Human Services+1 more: $536 · Human ServicesYESHIVA OHEL SIMON OF JERUSALEM INC: $15,000 · ReligionTHE CHASDEI SHIMON FOUNDATION: $14,700 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $11,800 · ReligionYESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC: $9,850 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $7,315 · Religion+1 more: $518 · ReligionYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $34,411 · EducationTHE OJC FUND: $16,100 · EducationBAIS SHAINDEL: $6,000 · EducationYESHIVA KOL TORAH INC: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationDONORS FUND INC: $10,900 · Philanthropy
Other$507,279Food & Nutrition$93,200Human Services$79,859Religion$59,183Education$59,011Philanthropy$10,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $93,200 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $66,863 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $34,411 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $16,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OHEL SIMON OF JERUSALEM INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHASDEI SHIMON FOUNDATION: $14,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $11,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $10,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC: $9,850 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $7,315 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS SHAINDEL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF JERUSALEM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTZIDKAS AVRAHAM INC: $3,960 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KOL TORAH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $536 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $518 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF WOODLAKE VILLAGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC: $172 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HATZEDAKA INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OHEL SIMON OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHASDEI SHIMON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TORAS CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP ↗
  • Who funds BAIS SHAINDEL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds TZIDKAS AVRAHAM INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KOL TORAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundDonors Fund IncJack Adjmi Family Fou…Jewish Community Foun…Jewish Communal FundYes Ben Dovid Foundat…Zichron Btz Tzedakah …The Zev and Susan Mun…The Sorala FoundationKeren Yud Mem IncKollel Zichron Avroho…Jacob and Malka Fisch…
The Ojc FundNY43.6× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Communal Fund · Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Keren Yud Mem Inc · Kollel Zichron Avrohom Inc · Jacob and Malka Fischer Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katz Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katz Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Kol Torah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Gedolah Keren Hatorah Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Katz Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Katz Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Katz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home