Skip to content

· Private foundation

Katz Bick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$475k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$874kEducation$727kScience & Tech$60kPhilanthropy$50kInternational$22kHealth$17kSocial Science$15kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $306k
$14,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Shalhevet High School$150,000
Harkham Hillel Hebrew Academy$54,100
Individual grant recipient$51,500
Trustees$50,000
President and Fellows$35,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Jewish Campus Life Fund (Columbia Hillel)$23,000
International Beit Din$17,200
Bnei Akiva of Los Angeles$14,400
Mechon Hadar$10,000
Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance$10,000
Midwest Campers (Camp Stone)$10,000
Mikvah Society of Los Angeles$6,000
Sharsheret$5,540
United Nations Watch - USA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Alexandria House: $4k → 14%Alexandria House: $4k → 14%Alexandria House: $573 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
RI
CA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 16 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
28

Total granted

$1.5M
$194k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BEIT DIN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +317%
  • JO
    Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • BD
    Bnai David Judea Synagogue
    one grant, 2024 · $51k
  • JO
    JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -28%
  • V
    Various
    one grant, 2020 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
Hashevaynu Inc

The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.

Education
7
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
8
American Friends of Yeshiva High School of Kiryat Arba Inc

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.

Philanthropy
9
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
10
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
11
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
12
University of Judaism Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Maharat Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHALHEVET HIGH SCHOOL: $478,994 · OtherSHALHEVET HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $308,663 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHarkham Hillel Hebrew Academy: $292,202 · OtherHarkham Hillel Hebrew AcademyVanguard Charitable - Katz Bick DAF: $137,700 · OtherVanguard Charitable - Katz Bick DAFIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · Other+35 more: $282,725 · Other+35 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $60,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $5,000 · EducationYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $3,610 · EducationJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $50,018 · Philanthropy+1 more: $360 · PhilanthropyBNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES: $23,320 · ReligionKESHER FAMILIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $5,000 · Religion+1 more: $325 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL BEIT DIN INC: $35,800 · Crime & LegalSharsheret Inc: $13,446 · HealthYESH TIKVA INC: $2,500 · HealthJewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc: $15,010 · Social Science
Other$1,640,284Education$68,610Philanthropy$50,378Religion$38,645Crime & Legal$35,800Health$15,946Social Science$15,010

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $50,018 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BEIT DIN INC: $35,800 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES: $23,320 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc: $15,010 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $13,446 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $12,088 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC: $10,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKESHER FAMILIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALEXANDRIA HOUSE: $8,465 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST CAMPERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $3,610 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESH TIKVA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA: $325 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds JGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BEIT DIN INC ↗
  • Who funds BNEI AKIVA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds KESHER FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST CAMPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT MAHARAT INC ↗
  • Who funds YESH TIKVA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY28.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Micah Philanthropies · Kolatch Family Foundation · Aviv Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Eric and Tamar Goldstein Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katz Bick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katz Bick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Katz Bick Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Katz Bick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Katz Bick’s filings →

More from the funding graph