Skip to content

· Private foundation

Katherine Baxter Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$48kYouth Development$25kHealth$14kReligion$13kArts & Culture$6kEducation$5kPhilanthropy$3kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$7,500
KIWANIS CLUB OF ESCONDIDO FOUNDATIO$5,000
GREEN OAK RANCH$3,000
SAN DIEGO CHILDRENS DISCOVERY MUSEU$2,500
DIAL A PRAYER MINISTRIES$2,500
PATRICK HENRY HS ALUMNI FOUNDATION$1,200
PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $8k → 11%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $7k → 11%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 10 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$109k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
-36%

Still filing today

50%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +74%
  • KC
    Kiwanis Club of Escondido Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue +569%
  • GO
    GREEN OAK RANCH
    5× · 2018–2024 · $13k · revenue +475% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • EC
    ESCONDIDO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PALOMAR FAMILY YMCA: $29,500 · OtherPALOMAR FAMILY YMCADIAL-A- PRAYER MINISTRIES: $13,329 · OtherDIAL-A- PRAYER MINISTRIESPATRICK HENRY HS ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $3,200 · OtherPATRICK HENRY HS ALUMNI FOUNDATIONESCONDIDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Other+13 more: $9,050 · Other+13 moreYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $18,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTYKiwanis Club of Escondido Foundation: $17,000 · Human ServicesKiwanis Club of Escondido Foundat…GREEN OAK RANCH: $13,000 · HealthGREEN OAK RA…YOUNG LIFE: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$57,079Human Services$35,000Health$13,000Youth Development$7,000Arts & Culture$5,000Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKiwanis Club of Escondido Foundation: $17,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetGREEN OAK RANCH: $13,000 over 5y, 35% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSan Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Kiwanis Club of Escondido Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREEN OAK RANCH ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PASSIONLIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds San Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East County Economic Development CouncilCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East County Economic Development Council · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katherine Baxter Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katherine Baxter Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Katherine Baxter Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph