Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Katherine and George Fan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
9
Organizations funded FY2023
56%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of Katherine and George Fan Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Katherine and George Fan Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $72k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
4
’18
1
’19
3
’20
1
’21
1
’22
5
’23
4
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 9
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
3
Total assets, FY2023
$469k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 56% of the organizations Katherine and George Fan Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 32% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20239$72k56%
FY20224$177k0%
FY20214$276k50%
FY20209$82k56%
FY20194$62k50%
FY20189$221k67%
FY20178$157kn/a
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$585kEducation$379kHealth$84kInternational$20kReligion$19kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$10kCommunity Improvement$7kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Katherine and George Fan Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco$150,00040%
Feldenkrais Foundation Inc$70,000247%
The Forgotten International$20,00021%
Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers$13,0002n/a
American Friends of the Shanghai Museum Inc$10,00015%
New York Women's Chamber of Commerce Inc$7,00021%
Jazz at Lincoln Center Inc$6,00020%
Teatown Lake Reservation Inc$5,0001n/a
Museum of Modern Art$3,40030%
The Carnegie Hall Corporation$3,00010%
Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts Inc$1,00010%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$1,00010%
Ossining Volunteer Ambulance Corps Inc$30020%
Ossining Children's Center Inc$20010%

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($842k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Katherine and George Fan Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAsian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco: $150,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFeldenkrais Foundation Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetThe Forgotten International: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of the Shanghai Museum Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetNew York Women's Chamber of Commerce Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJazz at Lincoln Center Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $3,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Carnegie Hall Corporation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLincoln Center for the Performing Arts Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOssining Volunteer Ambulance Corps Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOssining Children's Center Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Katherine and George Fan Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Katherine and George Fan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Katherine and George Fan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Katherine and George Fan Foundation

How much does Katherine and George Fan Foundation give?
Katherine and George Fan Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $72,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Katherine and George Fan Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (47%), Education (30%), Health (7%).
Who are Katherine and George Fan Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco ($150k), Feldenkrais Foundation Inc ($70k), The Forgotten International ($20k).
Does Katherine and George Fan Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 56% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Katherine and George Fan Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Katherine and George Fan Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Katherine and George Fan Foundation based?
Katherine and George Fan Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Katherine and George Fan’s filings →

More from the funding graph