Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kasi Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$33kReligion$32kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$2kHousing & Shelter$1kAnimals$270Human Services$258Community Improvement$250Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$501
Median grant
3
States reached
$300k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
P KALIAPPAN TEMPLE$11,711
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO$5,000
SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMI TEMPLE$1,501
INDIAN VALUE ENGINEERING SOCIETY$800
SAIVA SIDHDHANTHA SABHAI AMERICA$501
LAURANCE ARMOUR DAY SCHOOL$501
GOFUNDME ORGANIZATION$294
HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY$270
OUTREACH HOUSE$258
MCDONALD CORPORATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 56% of grant dollars ($40k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 44% that went abroad ($31k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $258) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OUTREACH HOUSE: $258 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 44% of all-years giving ($31k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$31k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $31,200 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGOSOMASUNDARI UCLANAYA SOMANATHAR THI: $18,000 · OtherSOMASUNDARI UCLANAYA SOMANATHAR THIP KALIAPPAN TEMPLE: $11,711 · OtherP KALIAPPAN TEMPLE+10 more: $7,006 · Other+10 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSAIVA SIDDHDHANTHA SABHAI AMERICANS INCORPORATED: $501 · ReligionRush University Medical Center: $410 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $270 · AnimalsTHE OUTREACH HOUSE: $258 · Human Services
Other$67,917Housing & Shelter$1,000Religion$501Health$410Animals$270Human Services$258

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAIVA SIDDHDHANTHA SABHAI AMERICANS INCORPORATED: $501 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OUTREACH HOUSE: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTH CENTRAL CONNECTICUT ↗
  • Who funds SAIVA SIDDHDHANTHA SABHAI AMERICANS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE OUTREACH HOUSE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kasi Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kasi Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kasi’s filings →

    More from the funding graph