· Private foundation
Karol Pilarczyk Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MCGILL UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| POLISH INSTITUE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE | $5,250 |
| WHITE STORK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| POLISH CENTER OF DISCOVERY & LEARNING | $250 |
| POLISH American Museum | $250 |
| PILSUDSKI INSTITUTE OF AMERICA | $250 |
| SEMBRICH MUSEUM | $250 |
| Copernicus Center | $250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| POLISH ASSISTANCE INC | $250 |
| Kosciuszko Foundation | $250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 41% of grant dollars ($50k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 59% that went abroad ($70k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Beyond the US: 59% of all-years giving ($70k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 13% of Karol Pilarczyk Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.
10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MUMCGILL UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $70k
THE KOSCIUSZKO FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue -20%- PIPOLISH INSTITUE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE2× · 2024–2025 · $10k
Funded once
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +34%- AIAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF POLISH CULTURE INCone grant, 2020 · $200 · revenue +22%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: The Rosenstiel Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Karol Pilarczyk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karol Pilarczyk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Karol Pilarczyk’s filings →