Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karelou Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$810kReligion$140kHealth$96kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$12k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT COLLEGE$50,000
SETON HILL UNIVERSITY$25,000
DEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING & SPEECH$20,000
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY$20,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$10,000
UPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTER$10,000
SISTERS OF CHARITY OF SETON HILL$10,000
ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY$7,000
AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$5,000
WOODS SERVICES$5,000
POINT PARK UNIVERSITY$3,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$3,000
EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOODS SERVICES: $5k → 6%AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $7k → 11%AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $7k → 11%AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $7k → 11%AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $7k → 11%AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $5k → 11%AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $5k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$963k · 12 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$963k
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+15%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $252k · revenue +19%
  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $175k · revenue +6%
  • SETON HILL UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $103k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +15%
  • IS
    IRENE S TAYLOR SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
2
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
4
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
5
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $252,000 · EducationSAINT VINCENT COLLEGEDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $175,000 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRITSETON HILL UNIVERSITY: $103,000 · EducationSETON HILL UNIVERSITYDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH: $92,000 · EducationDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECHMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $33,000 · EducationSISTERS OF CHARITY OF SETON HILL: $70,000 · OtherSISTERS OF CHARITY OF SETON HIL…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $70,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORUPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTER: $53,000 · OtherUPMC HILLMAN CANCER CENTERST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $51,000 · OtherST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $34,000 · OtherPOINT PARK UNIVERSITYIRENE S TAYLOR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $20,000 · OtherIRENE S TAYLOR SCHOLARSHIP FUNDAUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $38,000 · Human ServicesEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesWoods Services Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Education$705,000Other$298,000Human Services$55,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $252,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HILL UNIVERSITY: $103,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH: $92,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $70,000 over 6y, 58% of budgetST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $51,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $38,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $34,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWoods Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds SETON HILL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM PROJECT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds Woods Services Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karelou Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karelou Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Karelou’s filings →

    More from the funding graph