Skip to content
Kappa Kappa Gamma Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kappa Kappa Gamma Foundation

Investing in our members by funding programs that fulfill the evolving needs of women.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$20M
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $1,307,736, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,885,606 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,577,870 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $159k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$159,236
Median grant
4
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY$1,106,574
BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA$159,236
THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA$26,926
DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GAMMA ZETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $123k → 15%Beta Xi House Corporation: $3.0M → 10%Epsilon Alpha House Corporation: $101k → 11%DELTA PSI HOUSE CORPORATION: $151k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $2.2M → 16%Gamma Nu House Corporation: $656k → 14%GAMMA NU EDUCATIONAL AREA: $161k → 17%THETA EDUCATIONAL GRANT: $500k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $156k → 7%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $757k → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $491k → 19%BETA CHI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $373k → 15%BETA XI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $544k → 10%EPSILON ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION: $68k → 11%Delta Psi House Corporation: $52k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $371k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $377k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $75k → 7%Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity: $727k → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $265k → 19%BETA CHI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $75k → 15%BETA XI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $393k → 10%EPSILON ALPHA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $51k → 11%DELTA PSI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $47k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $300k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $152k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $49k → 7%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.3M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $235k → 19%BETA CHI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $25k → 15%DELTA PSI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $39k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $194k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $136k → 17%EPSILON BETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $35k → 7%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.3M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $181k → 19%DELTA PSI EDUCATIONAL AREA: $37k → 17%BETA THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $168k → 16%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $77k → 17%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.1M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $42k → 19%THETA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $27k → 17%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $1.0M → 15%DELTA IOTA EDUCATIONAL AREA: $15k → 19%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $936k → 15%KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $728k → 15%BETA NU HOUSE CORPORATION: $118k → 15%Beta Nu House Corporation: $98k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OH
CO
MO
KY
AZ
AR
SC
OK
LA
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 10 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$18M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KK
    KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +37%
  • BX
    Beta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity
    2× · 2017–2022 · $3.4M · revenue +37%
  • BT
    BETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +31% · 99% of their budget

Funded once

  • GN
    GAMMA NU HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA
    one grant, 2017 · $656k · revenue +20% · 32% of their budget
  • BX
    BETA XI EDUCATIONAL AREA
    one grant, 2020 · $544k
  • KK
    KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gamma Tau Chapter Housing Corp

Lease real estate to gamma tau chapter of kappa alpha order

—
2
Gamma Theta Incorporated

Provide housing for undergraduate chapter of national collegiate fraternity and facilitate between alumni and undergraduate members.

—
3
Eta Kappa House Corporation of Delta Gamma Fratern

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports
4
Delta Tau Delta Association of Columbia Mo

A house corporation that owns the delta tau delta fraternity house at the the university of missouri - columbia. the mission is to provide housing for the gamma kappa chapter of the delta tau delta fraternity.

—
5
Alpha Kappa of Alpha Chi Omega Alumni Holding Association

Collegiate sorority housing

—
6
Beta Omega House Corporation of Delta Gamma Frater

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
7
Sigma Tau of Kappa Delta Housing Associa

Provide Chapter House for Students

—
8
Delta Gamma House Corporation

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Membership Benefit
9
Alpha Psi House Corporation of Delta Gamma Inc

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
10
Gamma Xi House Corporation of Delta Gamma Inc

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

—
11
Eta Gamma House Corporation of Delta Gamma Fratern

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports
12
Kappa Delta House Corporation

Provide safe and enjoyable housing for the social sorority resident and chapter members and foster leadership skills and social graces in members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epsilon Beta House Association of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity; the most unlike its peers is Delta Iota House Corporation of Kappa Ka. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $7,890,674 · OtherKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITYBeta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity: $3,419,995 · OtherBeta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma FraternityBETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $3,381,196 · OtherBETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITYDELTA IOTA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KA: $1,229,493 · OtherDELTA IOTA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA HOUSE CORPORATION: $769,127 · Other+11 more: $3,112,139 · Other+11 moreBETA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA: $472,453 · Education
Other$19,802,624Education$472,453

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $7,890,674 over 9y, 17% of budgetBeta Xi House Corporation of Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity: $3,419,995 over 2y, 20% of budgetBETA THETA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $3,381,196 over 7y, 99% of budgetDELTA IOTA HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KA: $1,229,493 over 7y, 31% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA HOUSE CORPORATION: $769,127 over 6y, 25% of budgetGAMMA NU HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA: $656,047 over 1y, 32% of budgetBETA CHI HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA: $472,453 over 3y, 26% of budgetDELTA PSI HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $325,412 over 5y, 28% of budgetEPSILON BETA HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FRATERNITY: $319,723 over 6y, 17% of budgetEpsilon Alpha House Association Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity: $220,011 over 3y, 61% of budgetBETA NU BUILDING ASSOCIATION: $215,502 over 2y, 24% of budgetGAMMA ZETA BUILDING ASSOCIATION: $122,909 over 2y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kappa Kappa Gamma Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kappa Kappa Gamma Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kappa Kappa Gamma’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home